Rafael Benitez wore a training top to his press conference on Friday, supped from a bottle of water and beamed through the difficult questions. He succeeded in giving the two impressions he wanted to. Here was a humble employee, fresh from his practice-ground work, happy with his lot. It was a good week for Benitez. He celebrated his 48th birthday on Wednesday by taking some Spanish journalists for a bite in West Kirby. Liverpool supporters kept approaching the table. “They were coming up and saying, ‘Come on, Rafa’,” the manager smiled.

A good week for Benitez? Those unfamiliar with Anfield politics might have imagined not. After all, Liverpool’s boardroom has brought to mind TV writer Phil Redmond’s description of the City of Culture steering company, wracked by infighting before he arrived to clean things up. “It was like a scouse wedding,” Redmond said. It had been supposed that Benitez would despair about the off-field manoeuvring which saw one owner, Tom Hicks, call for the resignation of Rick Parry, the chief executive, and the other owner, George Gillett, purport to be above all the “washing of dirty linen in public” – while, very publicly, telling Hicks to shut up. Far from it. Issues such as transfer policy and his own future are now being aired which Benitez has wanted dealt with for some time – and the answers all sides are giving appear to favour the Spaniard.

Put simply, the battle for Anfield has become a popularity contest where only Benitez can hand out the prize. Hicks needs to boost his standing, in order to counter what he sees as a campaign of spin against him, and meet parallel objectives. He is trying to raise money to buy out Gillett and wants to show investors that he knows what he accuses Parry of being ignorant of – what Liverpool FC needs. If he succeeds, the club’s new sole owner will at the very least have to reduce fans’ disdain to the point he can actually visit Merseyside, something he feels unsafe doing right now. The key to both is demonstrating backing for Benitez. If the status quo remains (Gillett has stopped even pretending he will try and buy out Hicks) and the Americans, with their 50%-50% shares continue to cancel each other out, somebody is going to have to run Liverpool. That might have been Parry but, now, sullied by Hicks’s revelation that he took part in the approach to Jurgen Klinsmann, and wounded by Hicks’s arguments about the shortcomings of his commercial strategy – backed by business experts and one of the few issues fans agree with Hicks on – the chief executive is compromised. So who else would emerge as the dominant figure but Benitez?

If Hicks is forced to sell to Dubai International Capital (DIC), who already have an agreement to buy from Gillett, the Arab investors would need to start on the right footing with supporters and would require Benitez’s patronage. Why should he give it unless DIC support him as much as Hicks? If Hicks says he would extend Benitez’s contract by a year, DIC must offer the same. If Hicks would allow Benitez to make a further round of big signings, so must DIC. It is understood, incidentally, that DIC would have little problem with either of these. The final scenario is that Benitez gets offered another of the best managerial jobs in Europe this summer. He now knows he could walk away from Anfield with nobody blaming him.

Benitez has fought political battles at most clubs he has managed and always won. He is not only good at plotting football tactics. Explaining his good mood, he mentioned having just tied up deals to bring three players – one senior, two youth – to Liverpool next season. He had complained to Hicks and Gillett that his poor relationship with Parry was fouling up transfers. “Since Sunday, we (the club) have progressed,” Benitez smiled, suggesting he is now in total control of signings.

Let the others fight and damage each other, and build your empire in the meantime. The strategy seems sound as long as the team keeps winning – and there is evident confidence they will against Chelsea in the Champions League. Has Klinsmann been in touch, in the spirit of solidarity as a fellow manager? “For preparing the game against Fulham or Chelsea?” Benitez cackled. “No.”

Rafa sure to come out smiling . . .

Whichever way the Anfield power struggle is to settle, it seems manager Rafa Benitez, inset, will be happy

Scenario One: Tom Hicks buys out George Gillett and assumes total control. ‘I would give Rafa a contract extension. It’s time for Liverpool to have one strong owner that can give Rafa the support he needs to win trophies.’

Scenario Two: DIC take over the club. The Arab investors want to show they care about Liverpool FC more than Tom Hicks and know what Koppites want. That means keeping Benitez.

Scenario Three: Stalemate between Hicks and Gillett remains, no DIC buy-out.

With nobody above him able to wield power and take Liverpool forward, it falls to Benitez. Rick Parry, with whom he has a flawed working relationship, no longer has the authority to challenge him.

Scenario Four: Real Madrid/Inter Milan/ Barcelona/Juventus offer Benitez a job. Rafa could walk away from Anfield with his head held high. Who would now blame him after all this season’s infighting?