Martin Samuel, Chief Football Correspondent in Barcelona
We've made some changes
to The Sunday Times

Manchester United missed the penalty, but Barcelona the opportunity. Cristiano Ronaldo could have decided this match in the third minute but shot wide and, metaphorically, Barcelona did much the same in the remaining 87. Several chances in the second half went begging, enough to win comfortably, and Sir Alex Ferguson’s team will surely not be as tame as this at Old Trafford in five days’ time.
Nor can they afford to be if they want to reach the final in Moscow next month. Despite Ronaldo’s aberration from the spot, when the match was still cold, United will consider themselves fortunate to have taken a draw from the Nou Camp last night. Barcelona were the better team by some distance, had the best chances from open play and, now needing to score an away goal to progress on aggregate, should in no way be undervalued. It needed Edwin van der Sar to be at his best in the United goal to keep them at bay here and one goal at Old Trafford could prove costly for Ferguson’s men. It has in the past.
A goalless first leg is not the result it seems at first glance. United earned one in Monaco, Madrid and Volgograd in previous campaigns and lost all three ties. Only once, against Panathinaikos, has a goalless away draw set United up for a home victory and Barcelona have as much to offer as any team in Europe beyond home soil. United will be hugely vulnerable to every counter-attack and when a team boast the attacking capacity on display here, that is no idle threat. Thierry Henry as a substitute is some luxury and his arrival in the 76th minute produced two shots from range that needed the best attention of Van der Sar.
The sole complaint from United on the night was that Ronaldo should have had a penalty in the 28th minute, after a clumsy collision with Rafael Márquez as they tussled for a loose ball. Ronaldo’s fall was so mannered, however, that it probably undermined his case and Massimo Busacca, the Swiss referee, waved play on. Considering what happened when Ronaldo did win a penalty, however, who knows if it would have made a difference. He seemed greatly affected by his early miss, had a quiet game by his standards and may not have been in the right frame of mind to accept redemption.
And now, the familiar debate will resurface. Does Ronaldo have the temperament for the biggest matches? Does he choke when the pressure is really on? There will have been a million or more armchair experts taking a self-satisfied swig from their lubricant of choice and crowing: “I told you so.” It is all a little unfair, really.
The case for the defence, for mitigation, would argue that few players would be cool and composed so soon on such a huge occasion. One minute Ronaldo was in the dressing-room thinking about United’s biggest match of the season, the next he was standing over the chance that could decide it. So he faltered. So nerves got the better of him. How many times has that happened in this campaign? Give the kid a break.
There was barely 90 seconds on the clock when Ronaldo was given the chance, we now know, to win the match. First, he took a phenomenally ambitious free kick from the best part of 40 yards, which deflected off Barcelona’s blockers for a corner. When that came in, his header was smothered by the outstretched arms of Gabriel Milito and when Busacca pointed to the spot, Ronaldo picked up the ball and prepared to take the weight.
Unsurprisingly, the home team’s support was not best pleased and the wall of noise that greeted Ronaldo as he assessed the situation felt like Anfield squared. Remember his penalty against Arsenal at Old Trafford in the league recently, the one when he checked his run halfway before burying the shot, was asked to retake, and had the audacity to repeat it, right down to the cocky pause in mid-stride? Well, think the polar opposite and you have a mental picture of what happened here.
Ronaldo ran up without delaying, in conventional fashion, aimed high, in conventional fashion, and sent his effort wide, in conventional fashion. Well, if you have been brought up on English penalty-takers, that is.
And that was pretty much that from United, save a shot from Michael Carrick that struck the side-netting midway through the second half. For the rest of the match, the noble Paul Scholes aside, they surrendered the heart of midfield and the lion’s share of possession to Barcelona, whose fall as a power in Champions League football has been seriously overstated. Key players such as Ronaldinho and Henry were missing from the starting line-up, but they had enough talent to give United the skilful battle of equals that they do not face in the Barclays Premier League, unless Arsenal are at their peak.
Lionel Messi was in scintillating form for an hour, particularly for a player so recently returned from injury, Deco belied the rumours that he had turned into a workshy dilettante since Barcelona’s Champions League win in 2006, while Andrés Iniesta and Xavi Hernández pulled the strings beautifully in midfield. Yaya Touré, the brother of Arsenal’s Kolo, was a flawless screening presence in front of the back four, looking every inch the player his sibling once compared to Patrick Vieira. It is amazing that he is not with Kolo in North London, really. He had a trial with Arsenal, but they did not fancy him.
They would have fancied him last night as he kept United at arm’s length, their venom removed by the early disappointment. Barcelona, by contrast, buzzed around the United penalty area, always alert, always dangerous, and in the space of ten minutes missed four good chances from Gianluca Zambrotta, Xavi and Samuel Eto’o (twice). Messi left the field after an hour, by which time the point was made, though. United have a live one here: silly to think that it was ever going to be anything else, really.
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
See the best entries in this year's competition
Your brain is capable of more than you might think...
An interactive preview of the brand new For Your Eyes Only exhibition
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers

Love Sudoku? Play our brand new interactive game: with added functionality and daily prizes

Are you irritable when you return from work? Drained of emotion? You could be suffering from boreout
Prepare for some shock and awe, petrol lovers. Despite the greens trying to wipe it out, the car is about to offer us the most exciting year ever
We've trawled the brochures and websites to find this summer’s best holidays for every taste and budget

Find a course, arrange a game and save money

Will your team win their match this weekend?



in The Sunday Times, Times and Times Online
2002/02
£59,995
The Midlands
2008/08
£169,950
Scotland
2007/57
£35,000
South East England
Great car insurance deals online
Competitive
CyDen
London
To £28k
Barclaycard
Various (outside London)
£
£40,000 - £50,000 + benefits
Lloyds Pharmacy
Coventry
To £38k
Barclaycard
Northampton/Liverpool
2 Bathrooms, Balcony and Garden
£359,950
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Apts From £249,950
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property.
© Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
my name is martin i do hope man u win it going to be a hARD GAME WE ALL NO IT IS GOING TO BE BUT I HOPE FOR THE BEST LIKE WE ALL DO
MARTIN, ST.AUSTELL , CORNWALL
I think Martin Samuel is misremembering the match if he thinks van der Saar needed to be at his best. He just needed to be adequate - and he was.
It will be a very different game next week and, in all likelihood, United will crack open a poor Barcelona defence and score two or three.
Giordano Bennetti, Swindon,
I was under the impression that the waving of an imaginary card by a player intent on influencing the referee was itself an offence immediately punishable by a yellow card. Aside from being childish and unsporting, it's downright ruddy annoying.
Deco wants to be taught a few manners by someone...
Brendan, Martin, Slovakia
Fergie said he doesn't know why UTD lacked greater penetration. Is he joking? Fergus & Andrei are right. Barca could've been slaughtered, but the leery brothers' axis of angst again shackled UTD's congenital attacking spirit. SAF says he trusts his players. Unshackle them so! We are better than this
sean, dublin, ireland
Last night we missed a great opportunity to score an away goal and get in front. Missing Vidic and the early penalty made us almost happy to get a 0-0 draw, ehrn we could have got much more had we played our normal game.
I hope we don't come to regret it!
Philippos, Limassol, Cyprus
As a Utd supporter I was very disappointed by their performance, but equally one should not get lulled into a false sense of how good Barca were. They were predictable, and had Ferguson encouraged Utd to attack in the way Liverpool did there last year, then the tie would already be over.
Jerry, Sydney,
Utd played defensively, hoping to nick a goal. Barca had all the ball but didn't create any real chances (unlike the article suggests).
Utd should be confident enough to play their normal attacking football. Negative tactics could give Barca confidence & there is always the risk of an away goal.
Neal, Leeds, West Yorkshire
United were lucky in the sense that if you allow teams like Barcelona to have such a lion's share of the ball, there are players within the team who can do real damage.
However on a more positive note for united I thought Barcelona were very poor in the final third.
Tony, Chester, United Kingdom
Sir Allex has to play Anderson and Darren Fletcher (if fit) both players snap at oponents heals and drive forward - unsetlling teams (think of Arsenal). They always deliver in the big games. Leave Scholes and Park on the bench
Trevor Bailey, Bradford, England
What a wonderful catenaccio!!! :-)
However I think ManU will get the final. Ferguson were terrified to repeat the 2007 semi-final. Barcelona is not as good as spaniards think...
Cristiano ronaldo is a bighead, never really dangerous, Rooney the best imho.
Alex, Brescia, Italy
We're going to smash you in Old Trafford,you'll see what means to play high level matches..you just have a few players used to that,we have all.Henry central forward,Eto'o in the left wing and Messi in the right=1-3
I can feel your legs starting to shake
Anybody seen Tévez or Rooney yesterday?
Emilio Barrera, Budapest,
Hasn't anyone noticed yet that Ronaldo is often subdued in the really big matches, yet he usually bowls over the premiership opposition with relative ease.
joe, sale,
Barcelona controlled and dominated and will have a better chance of scoring in the return leg. Utd will have to push forward more, and like the Arsenal game will still be chasing the ball.
A 90 minute Messi and Henry should be enough for Barcelona, with Utd having to win to advance.
M.Smith, London,
when is Man Utd. coming to Barcelona? Don't Know who is more scared by now...
Xavier Trilla, Barcelona, Catalonia
Many comments posted so far dispute the main thrust of the story - that Barcelona were far better than a weak looking United. I'm afraid the United fans are letting their loyalty obscure reality. United were awful. OK, so it's Barcelona in the Camp Nou, but this was an abject performance.
Old Hector, London,
"Barcelona, by contrast, were regularly buzzing around the United penalty area, always dangerous, always alert."
You're having a laugh aren't you? They never created half as many chances as Roma, and look what happened to them. They're a threat no doubt, but you're giving them too much credit IMO.
Adam Jenkinson, Hull, United Kingdom
"It needed Edwin van der Sar to be at his best... to keep them at bay."
He didn't make a single save of real note.
"Thierry Henry... produced two shots from range that needed the best attention of Van der Sar." The first - hard but straight at him. The second - feeble, the dive for show.
Andrew Bird, Lyon,
I would hardly agree Ronaldo had a quiet evening by his usual standards,he was involved in every attack, showed his ability to take the ball round players on several occasions, and his tricks and flicks were clearly appreciated by the Spaniards as they were included in all of the mid-game montages.
Liam McGarrity, Edinburgh, Badgerville
I totally agree with you, why we played 4-6-0?????
Barcelona without Puyol......we should take the chance and attack them instead defence and wait for them to attack....i don't understand SAF either.
Andrei Lau, Penang, Malaysia
I will never understand Queiroz and Fergie's tactics in Europe,would any other manager play 4-6-0 when their team should be looking to score goals against an out of sorts team and would anyone else play Ronaldo,Rooney and Tevez out of position?
Fergus Sira-Lexon, England,