Times Online and Agencies
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
Jeremie Aliadiere, the Middlesbrough striker, has been handed a four-match ban after his appeal against the red card he received at Liverpool was rejected.
Aliadiere was sent off by referee Lee Mason at Anfield on Saturday after aiming a slap at Javier Mascherano, who had earlier appeared to make contact with the Frenchman's face in an off-the-ball incident.
Boro appealed on the grounds that the offence did not amount to violent conduct, but the FA's regulatory commission rejected the claim as "frivolous" and increased the mandatory three-match ban for the offence to four.
A Football Association statement said: "At a regulatory commission hearing today, a claim for wrongful dismissal from Middlesbrough's Jeremie Aliadiere was rejected. The commission decided that the claim was frivolous and increased Aliadiere's suspension from three matches to four matches as a result with immediate effect."
Keith Lamb, the Middlesbrough chief executive, criticised the FA's decision and insisted his club had decided to appeal only after studying television replays and canvassing opinion on the decision.
“We considered Jeremie’s dismissal to be extremely harsh," Lamb said. “We find the inconsistency displayed in this whole incident unacceptable and quite unbelievable.
“According to the referee’s report, he had a ’good, clear view’ of the whole incident, including Javier Mascherano grabbing Jeremie Aliadiere’s face and Jeremie’s subsequent reaction.
“However, he decided that while Mascherano’s actions were acceptable and needed no further action, our player’s light flick was ’violent conduct’ and merited a straight red card.
“How can it be fair that one player receive a straight red card while the other receives no punishment at all?
“To further quote the Oxford Dictionary, the adjective ’violent’ is defined as ’involving great physical force’, which anyone who has seen the incident hardly describes Jeremie’s actions.”
The decision means Aliadiere will miss Wednesday's FA Cup fifth-round replay against Sheffield United and the following two Premier League matches, at home to Reading on March 1 and then away at Aston Villa on March 8, which is scheduled on the same day as the sixth round of the FA Cup. The Villa game will be postponed should Middlesbrough advance in the FA Cup, with Aliadiere missing that game instead. His extra-game ban will rule him out of a trip to the Emirates Stadium to face his former club, Arsenal.
There had been calls to punish Maschareno retrospectively for his part in the fracas, but this appears unlikely because it is understood referee Mason saw the full incident but decided not to penalise the Argentinian.
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
I have little or no interest in Boro but some things get me very annoyed. I happened to see the incident and if the ref had a "good clear view", then both should have gone off or neither. Maschareno was the instigator and possibly should have been punished even more severely - if indeed, any punishment was warranted.
Garry, Montreal
Garry Casey, Montreal, Canada
S.Trowbridge i think you should stay down in London and not comment on the Boro because you clearly dont have a clue what your talking about to say its fantastic that Aliadiere will be missing for four very important games when he has been our biggest goal threat since the turn of the year is laughable go and comment on the two up the road we dont need you!
A big thanks from all the Boro fans to the F.A. once again Has Graham Kelly been re-employed by any chance?
Michael, Middlesbrough,
Having seen the incident live on television I am concerned that if the referee says he saw the whole thing why was Maschareno not given a red card for the first incident .Which provoked a little tickle on the chin as a reaction to Aliadiere having his face grabbed, which was a lot more violent.
If the FA even bothered to review the TV footage they would have seen that the reaction was minimal and who the real villian was.
Had Aliadiere gone down poleaxed at the first touch from Maschareno like so many premier league prima donnas do , I suspect he would have been sent off for over acting and the Liverpool player given a round of applause from the gallery.
However this is what the smaller clubs have come to expect when compared to the so called "Majors" when dealing with the FA.
A good point has been made about the legality, never mind the morality of increasing the ban from 3 to 4 games without even having a hearing.
Justice pah!
Richard, Baku, Azerbaijan
A word of advice to the Boro hierarchy: When your own manager appears in numerous interviews after the game accepting the sending off and indeed saying the player "will learn from his mistake", the chances of a sympathetic ear from the FA are slim.
Whether "raising your hands" is in itself deserving of a sending off at all is a different argument altogether, the fact is that most of the time it will result in a red card. But it's amazing, actually staggering, that no action is to be taken against Mascherano.
And will people stop comparing this to the Eduardo break. One was a deliberate attempt to commit a (very, very minor) act of violence (ie a slap to the face), the other was a reckless, but non-malicious, tackle that went badly wrong.
Chris, Worthing, England
Atrocious decision from the FA from a Non Boro fan. Who are these nodding idiots, how do they make these decisions? Are they bringing football into disrepute with their lack of knowledge, sense and fairness? They seem unable to make a judgement. A shambles and one the FA need to sort out before the fans, players and managers lose confidence in the refs and football in this country.
James W-Smith, Cambridge, UK
Why do the FA bother to ask a referree to look at incident again, most of them have such big egos they wouldn't admit that they made a mistake and change their decision. Incidents such as the one in the Liverpool match should go to a panel of ex-professionals (with no allegience to the clubs involved) to look at and decide whether action should be taken. I don't think Aliadiere should have been sent off but if he was sent off then so should Maschareno as they both did the same thing, with Maschareno being the worst because instigated it.
Lorraine, Oxford,
I have met officials from the F.A. They are not like the rest of us. They know all the laws, but have no sense of justice.
Dave b, york, uk
To start, I am a Boro fan. Unfortunately, I did not see the offence on Saturday, so I cant comment on that. But, I am surprised that Middlesbrough even bothered to take this to the F.A in the first place. If you raise your hands, your off. Pure and simple. So for Boro to loose the appeal, not surprised at all. What does surprise me, is the increase in the ban! Is that even in the F.A rule book? I know they can increase a yellow to a red card but to increase a players ban because they believe the appeal to be frivolous seems to be very strange! Is this standard practice at the F.A? Have other teams fell foul of this rule? Arsenal should appeal Martin Taylor's sending off, it may get doubled! Now that's violent conduct.
Mark, Rotorua, New Zealand
I agree with Alex entirely. Nothing happened that should have warranted a card of any colour. The referee should have called both of them over, told them to stop being childish, and warned them that he wouldn't tolerate any repetition of such behaviour.
If this was "violence" what on earth will this ref do when somebody actually punches another player? Have him shot?
The FA have made themselves look ridiculous once again. Maybe someone should reprimand THEM for childish behaviour. The referee should be suspended for four games, not Aliadiere.
Barrie Collins, Long Sault, Ontario, Canada
(I'm not a Boro fan)..
English I know is a land of gentlemen, a land of thousand inventors. But when it turns to football (especially FA), they don't seem to have sense of logics at all. Martin Taylor has made Eduardo da Silva's leg broken. He gets a 3 match ban. Jeremie Aliadiere was sent off by referee Lee Mason at Anfield on Saturday after aiming a slap at Javier Mascherano, who had earlier appeared to make contact with the Frenchman's face in an off-the-ball incident. FA has increased the mandatory three-match ban for the offence to four. Aliadiere was just "aiming" a slap, and Mr. Taylor is "aiming" to get the ball (or eduardo's leg?). The results is that Eduardo is having his leg broken and have to wait 9 months to see if he is still able to kick the ball again, while Javier is very healthy at the moment, his legs are fine, and he probably smiling at Jeremie's cost. So think about that English (FA)..think..think..please think...
Denis Saputra, Jakarta, Indonesia
boro can have no complaints about the sending off. where they are 100% right, though, is in pointing out the inconsistency. mascherano should definitely have been sent off. indeed, he should have a longer ban as (excuse me for sounding like a three-year old) "he started it".
however, comments about the big four being favoured by the f.a. are out of order. arsenal and liverpool, sure. but manchester united never get any joy out of the f.a. as any number of ridiculous and unfair bans would testify. the main reason united would never get an extra game for a frivolous appeal is because now they don't even bother appealing when they have a cast iron case. they know they will get nowhere.
jem, london, uk
Oh come on! Liverpool fan here. How can you say ANYONE should have been sent off here? Both acted like schoolboys having a momentary playground spat. The referee should have been an adult and told them both to stop being naughty and got on with the game. The FAs decision to extend the ban is exactly why they're so ridiculed and worthless. meanwhile. players trying to break other player's legs are getting yellow cards.
Alex, California,
Cards on the table first - I am a Boro fan.
This decision demonstrates that the FA are still incapable of viewing some TV pictures and drawing a sensible balanced conclusion. I never expected the suspension to be wiped out - that rarely happens these days, even to the FA's favourite teams, - but to add an extra game was an extra twist of ineptitude that I hadn't expected when clearly all Boro wanted to do was question the 'violent conduct' label the offence had been given with a view to a ban more consistent to the offence e.g. one game.
I suggest the video evidence panel is itself suspended as it is clearly unfit for purpose in it's current form. If we must have a suspension system (which is a longer argument I think) then how about a one match ban for a red card unless the referee deems the offence dangerous to an opponent (or in Arsenal's case a team mate) in which case a 2 or 3 match ban would be appropriate.
Tim, Newcastle,
This decision by the FA is so unjust,it is unbelievable,i saw the whole incident and frankly i believe Mascherano should have been sent off for incitement,however he has achieved his objective with the aid of the FA.
Tunde Taiwo, Lagos, NIGERIA
Fantastic! That's four games where I won't have to watch Aliadiere in the Boro team. Hopefully they will appeal again.
S Trowbridge, London,
The panel must have been watching the wrong video. My whole hearted support must go to Boro. They have got to stand up to this very unfair decision.
Mike Clarke, Grange-Over-Sands, Cumbria
I'm not a boro fans by any means, but could you imagine someone playing for 'the big 4' getting an extra game for a frivolous appeal?
Mark, Newcastle,