Lewis Smith, Environment Correspondent, and Edward Gorman, Motor Racing Correspondent
Star musicians and your favourite Times writers at the Albert Hall
The Honda Formula One team trumpeted their environmentally friendly credentials yesterday when they announced that their new cars for this season are to feature a huge image of the Earth uncorrupted by commercial logos.
Despite running racing cars that do little more than four miles to the gallon and campaigning in a sport regarded by its critics as one of the most extravagant polluters, Honda unveiled their new livery with a fanfare at the Natural History Museum in London.
The Japanese manufacturer described the new look, which will feature on cars driven by Jenson Button and Rubens Barrichello, as a “call to action” directed at race fans and the public to join Honda’s “commitment to help address environmental issues facing mankind”.
The cars will have no sponsors logos but will instead sport a picture of the Earth made up of thousands of pixels that will contain the names of people who are prepared to pledge life-style changes to help to limit global warming. The pledges will be made via a website, myearthdream.com, and are designed to promote the idea, as the team put it, that “our car is your car”.
While critics accused Honda and other motor-racing teams of “burning up the Earth” with all the carbon emissions they produce, either racing or travelling to races, Honda insisted that they are meeting the challenge of global warming head-on. Nick Fry, the team principal, said: “We’re quite aware it’s a potentially contradictory thing to do. But the number of people we can reach is immense.”
Fry said that the ground-breaking decision to do away with the traditional car logos had been taken in recognition of the scale of the threat to the environment posed by global warming. This is caused, in large part, by carbon dioxide being pumped into the atmosphere through the use of fossil fuels.
“Climate change is probably the single biggest issue facing the global community and F1 is not immune from it,” he said. “We believe that F1, with its huge global profile and cutting-edge technology, can play an important role in not only highlighting the issues, but also playing our part in developing solutions. We hope that in raising awareness and highlighting the issues we will encourage members of the public to come together and help take on the challenge of climate change.”
Button, who, together with Barrichello, flew back from testing in Bahrain to be at the launch, was keen to lend his support to the initiative. “The people who work in F1 and the F1 viewers are probably the most difficult people to turn around into making a difference, so this campaign is important,” Button said. “It looks very different – no sponsors on the car. The idea is to raise awareness of global issues that we have and hopefully it’s going to make a difference.
“At the moment, F1 is carbon neutral, but that’s not where we want to be – it should be carbon positive. But maybe in the future it will get there.” The move by Honda will be seen by critics of the sport as an acknowledgment of the questionable future of Formula One in an age when the issue of global warming may make the notion of cars burning up petrol as part of a spectator sport unacceptable. Honda apart, Formula One has made moves towards reducing carbon emissions, with new regulations scheduled to come in from 2009 requiring cars to carry energy recovery technology.
Honda’s high-profile launch was criticised by some environmental campaigners, although Friends of the Earth and Green-peace held back from open condemnation.
Car manufacturers have just fought off attempts by the European Commission to introduce tough carbon emission targets. New cars in the UK average 169.4 grams of carbon dioxide emitted per kilometre, with Honda only mid-table in the European league of manufacturers with an average of 166g per km. By comparison, the RA107 Formula One car that Button and Barrichello will drive in 17 grands prix this year is estimated to emit a minimum of 1,500g per km.
Follow our three athletes' progress in their preparations for the London Triathlon, and pick up training tips and more
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles

Find a course, arrange a game and save money


Will your team win their match this weekend?

£129,500
Bentley Edinburgh
£79,850
Mercedes-Benz of Northampton
£26,995
Unit 1, Woodfield Business Unit, Kidderminster Road, Ombersley, Worcester.
Great car insurance deals online
90k + Bonus + Options
Confidential
London
£23,716 +
Highways Agency
National
£
£43,405 - £48,228 pa
Notting Hill Housing
London
£30,000 base, £100,000 OTE
Riches Consulting
London/South
with annexe accommodation and 5.25 acres
£1,100,000
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
I like this idea. Luddites be damned, we are an intelligent species and we must innovate our way out of the current problems.
We aren't living through the end of civilisation, only the beginning.
Anthony Charlton, Swindon,
Yes Nigel, yes Tobias, you are ofcourse correct, now stop being such hypocrites, turn off and unplug your computers, disconnect your homes from the national grid and retreat to a cave.
Prince Mainley, Hull,
Banning things can be so much fun, since nature is responsible for the majority of CO2 production why not ban that too ;)
ed, ottawa,
Does anyone know if F1 uses renewable fuels? If not why not? I believe there is a considerable difference between carbon neutral and using renewable fuels.
F1 could make a huge contribution to the conservation of fossil fuels, to the reduction in CO2 emissions, and the slowing down of global warming. At the same time the image of F1 would be enhanced; its contribution to solving an international problem would be seen as responsible and substantial, not just a vacuous logo ( a la Honda ).
michael tormey, dublin, ireland
F1 has been carbon neutral since 1997, so it is not a frivolous waste of fossil fuel as some are saying. In fact the opposite is true with the new technologies being develped on the track being used in road cars to reduce carbon emissions overall.
Phil, London, UK
Do we ban all entertainment? The oil being burned to heat a movie theatre; stay home. The wasted electricity cooling a church; stay home. The liters of petrol to drive or tube to Wimbledon; wasted. The electricity to watch the match; wasted.
Take the "ban F1" idea to its extreme and all activities outside of home and office are superfluous. If we don't take it to the extreme, then we let market forces dictate. If cost offsets to be carbon neutral were mandatory for all activities, sporting or retail or manucturing, we could make our own choices on where to spend our guilt-free time and money and the choices would be equal in environmental impact.
Jon T, St L , MO
I believe that the combined technical know-how of the F1 teams and their suppliers are just what the world needs to supply some of the technical solutions required to combat Global Heating, and that whilst Honda's current efforts smack of tokenism, such is the competitive nature of this sport, we could soon have team bidding to 'out-green' their competitors. A third championship perhaps ? As well as a Drivers' and Constructors champion, a 'Carbon' champion too ?
Nick Cummings, Bundy, QLD, Australia
They could always suggest car-sharing.
All the drivers get in one car and rush around really carefully. Then get Richard & Judy's & Sunday Kitchen's production company to hold a a phone competition on who was the winner, as it really could still be anyone's guess!
I think I'll pass on the Civic Hybrid. It's got a bit too much baggage (literally... for all my non-urban trips I'd be lugging round a battery)
Peter 'Junkkdotcom' Martin, Ross on Wye, UK
I agree 100% with Tobias. If Honda are really eco-friendly, why don't they withdraw from the sport?
Kevin Dickens, Nottingham, U.K.
If global warming is caused by emissions, doesn't it make sense to ban ativites that pollute without performing any practical function? All motor sport - not just F1 - should be banned as being a frivolous waste of fossil fuel. It might not solve the problem but it would be a start.
Honda's move is a cynical stunt. Ban F1 now! It will send a clear signal that environmentalists and governments are serious about tackling global warming.
Nigel Turner, Gaborone, Botswana
A publicity stunt. Being eco friendly is the current buzz word. Ask any MP. We need substance. A better stance would be to withdraw their cars from a pointless sport, now that, would speak volumes.
tobias, Oxford,