Adam Sage in Paris
Win a trip to the Ice Hotel in Lapland
Ron Dennis displayed a mixture of relief and indignation last night as he responded to the record fine and deduction of constructors’ points inflicted on his McLaren team by the World Motor Sport Council (WMSC).
The McLaren team principal denounced as unjust the ruling of the FIA here, but there was a sense that he had feared the outcome could have been even worse for the British team
Dennis had entered the hearing in the Place de la Concorde, where the guillotine worked overtime during the French Revolution, worried that his head and those of Lewis Hamilton and Fernando Alonso were on the block. After ten hours of debate, his team emerged bloodied but still alive.
“The most important thing is that we are going motor racing this weekend, the rest of the season and every season,” he said. His words betrayed the concern in the McLaren camp that Hamilton and Alonso could effectively have been forced out of the race for the drivers’ title. They escaped the worst-case scenario and Dennis said: “Our drivers can continue to compete for the World Championship.”
He went on to proclaim McLaren’s innocence, as he has done since the start of the scandal, saying: “I do not accept that we deserved to be penalised or have our reputation damaged in this way.
“We have never denied that the information from Ferrari was in the personal possession of one of our employees at his home. The issue is, was this information used by McLaren? This is not the case and has not been proven today.”
Dennis sought to rebut claims that e-mail messages between his drivers had shown them to be aware of a “spying operation” against Ferrari. “The World Motor Sport Council received statements from Fernando Alonso, Lewis Hamilton and Pedro De La Rosa [the test driver] stating categorically that no Ferrari information had been used by McLaren and that they had not passed any confidential data to the team,” he said.
It was a measure of the importance of the day to McLaren’s future that Dennis chose to read out a written statement to the press after the hearing. “I normally like to shoot from the hip, but I want to put a bit more discipline into what I say today,” he said.
The statement hinted that McLaren could have been the victim of a plot involving the two men who allegedly handled the 780-page dossier at the heart of the case — their former chief designer, Mike Coughlan, and Ferrari’s head of performance development, Nigel Stepney. “We do know that they were seeking employment with other teams,” it read.
Martin Whitmarsh, the McLaren chief executive, suggested that the team could appeal against the ruling, but said that their lawyers would need to study the written findings of the WMSC before making a final decision. “We believe we have grounds for appeal,” he said.
McLaren will pay financial penalties totalling $100 million (about £50 million) — about half from returned prizemoney and the rest in the form of a fine — but Dennis insisted that they could cope. “We have a turnover of $450 million to $500 million a year and we are debt-free. This is a very strong company,” he said.
He also insisted that he would continue at the helm of the team, rejecting rumours that he could be tempted to resign. “I’m committed to this company and I’m very passionate about motor racing,” he said.
Under the ruling, McLaren’s cars face an inspection next season to assess whether they have drawn on Ferrari technology. But Dennis dismissed the threat of a ban in 2008, saying: “There will be no issue.”
He had been accompanied by Hamilton for the first half of the hearing in what was seen as an attempt to highlight the stakes for Formula One’s newest star. Henrik Krauss, deputy vice-president of the FIA, indicated that Hamilton had said little. “He merely answered the lawyer’s questions,” Krauss said.
Dennis, on the other hand, had given an emotional defence in the face of the spying accusations, according to Krauss. “He was emotive, but there was no tension between McLaren and Ferrari,” he said. “This was a fair decision.”
Penalty clause
Previous heavy financial penalties handed out in Formula One
2006 Turkish Grand Prix organisers fined $2.5 million for allowing the Turkish Cypriot leader to present the winner’s prize.
2002 Ferrari and drivers Michael Schumacher and Rubens Barrichello fined $1 million after Austrian Grand Prix, which Barrichello dominated but was ordered to let Schumacher win. Half the fine suspended for a year.
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2005 / 55
£59,500
Great car insurance deals online
£Excellent+ executive benefits
Torres and Partners
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
Alstom Power
Europe
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Special Offers now available
At the new sophisticated
Encore Las Vegas Resort!
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
I love our British friends and allies dearly, but if there is a bias here, it's the McLaren fans on the big Island that appear to be blinded by a London fog. Who is the victim here? And why are past cases being revisited. There was no precedents for this issue in the past violations you site. You having a problem with who Ferrari saw fit to send over the line first does nothing to dilute the cheating in this case. There was no other team harmed by that effort to secure the maximum points for MS. Are you losing site of the fact that MS won the championship over Barrichello by 75 points and Montoya by 90; what did it matter? ON the other hand this season is as tight as it gets. Po po Ferrari all you want, but the F1 series is half of what it is without them. Losing them to some other factory supported effort could be a death wish for F1. If there is a bias, itâs the governing body trying to save their own ass, not Ferrariâs
Luicas, Escondido, USA CA
It is strange to me that Mercedes Benz so is shut up, I know the German mentality by work well and coexistence is all very straight and the same I say of the English but in negative. Still they are created a great empire and they live slowr than nobody in Europe
YoGroucho, Madrid, Spain
Unbelievable! Would McLaren have been fined if they had retained employment of Nigel Stepney? I very much doubt it. As an engineer familiar with some of the inner workings of F1, engineers swapping jobs between teams is common. Of course knowledge transfers as well. Iâm impressed with the degree that McLaren have gone too to prove that they are the unfortunate consequence of two immoral engineers in the business. I very much doubt any information made itâs way onto the McLaren cars. Tit bits of information exchanged between engineers and racing drivers does not constitute anything in reality in terms of real performance gain for their cars. I consider the action of Ferrari in favoring one driver to the extent of rigging a race (2002 Barrichello moving over for Schumacher on last lap) much much more damaging to the sport. What was Ferrariâs fine?
Please race fans, voice your anger at this decision; go watch IRL (in America) instead. Much more entertaining.
Dean, Michigan, USA
I have been a F1 fan for many years and have always stated that the FIA has always been biased towards Ferrari over all the other teams......my hunch has paid off with this scandal!!
Mr Mosely should never have been allowed to take part in these proceedings as it has been plain to all he has a personal vendetta against mr Ron Dennis!
Mclaren has always been the 'above board' organisation in racing. This just goes to show the lengths and depth some people will go to break others for their own good. Ferrari have once again won a hollow victory! We all know who the true victors are!!
des Krull, Cape Town, South Africa
ferrari are just cry babys it all omes down to that mclaren have the better car this season and they whoop ferrari ass at their home grand prix last week end its the only way ferrari will win anything this season by default mclaren were hard done to hope ron denni keeps up the good work and coms back stronger next season and whop ferrari's ass again
paul flower, sheffield, united kingdom
Are the FIA out to destroy F1? I have yet to see any evidence that any advantage was gained and it is only guilt by association. According to the FIA court, if my employee stole money from a bank I would be held liable as he worked for me thus I must be guilty of something. May I remind them this is not the middle ages and such a massive penalty should not be attributed to a company that only employeed the person where the fault belongs.
Terry, Altea - Alicante, Spain
So Ferrari win again !
Robert M Roberts, Funtley, Hants
If he is not guilty,ie, Mr R Dennis, why is he paying the fine.?Why not go to the court of appeal. Fight the case all the way. And if he loses , go on hunger strike until someone believes him. Only read the newspapers once a year and am starved of truth.
Garry Crush, Ebina-shi, Japan
When Ferrari cheated ,Ferrari payd the fine.
2002 Ferrari and drivers Michael Schumacher and Rubens Barrichello fined $1 million after Austrian Grand Prix, which Barrichello dominated but was ordered to let Schumacher win. Half the fine suspended for a year.
Tony, London, uk
me - i'm just turning the television off this weekend after 20+ years of f1 - advertisers dont pay if you turn off
Fred, dublin,
so,"sueaky clean" Ferrari win again,at least the FIA are being consistent!
Anyone who has watched F1 over many years,as I have,will recall many occasions when Ferrari or their drivers have got away with law breaking.Isnt it time the FAI recognised this and treated all teams in the same way.They wont because it isnt financially beneficial to them.Ferrari are a great team,but they need to fight it out on the track,not in uder the table poltics
Peter, Baguio, Philippines