Times Online and Agencies
Win a trip to the Ice Hotel in Lapland
Renault are facing a charge of possessing "confidential information" belonging to McLaren.
Representatives of the Renault team are facing a hearing of the FIA World Motor Sport Council in Monaco on December 6.
A statement on the FIA website read: "The team representatives have been called to answer a charge that between September 2006 and October 2007, in breach of article 151c of the International Sporting Code, the Renault F1 Team had unauthorised possession of documents and confidential information belonging to Vodafone McLaren Mercedes, including, but not limited to the layout and critical dimensions of the McLaren F1 car, together with details of the McLaren fuelling system, gear assembly, oil cooling system, hydraulic control system and a novel suspension component used by the 2006 and 2007 McLaren F1 cars."
Renault won the Formula One drivers' and constructors' championships in 2005 and 2006 but failed to win a race this season after double world champion Fernando Alonso moved to McLaren. The Spaniard has since left the team and is tipped for a return to the French team.
This is the second 'spying' row to hit the sport this year after McLaren were given a record £50 million fine after being found guilty of a similar charge in September. The team were also thrown out of the constructors' championship after they were found to be in possession of technical information belonging to Ferrari.
Renault were dragged into the affair when it was alleged a former member of staff had taken several CDs worth of data to the Renault team. McLaren's lawyers brought the matter to the attention of the FIA on the eve of their own hearing in September, which prompted the investigation by the sport's governing body.
Max Mosley, the FIA president, said at the time the accusations against Renault revolved around an employee who had left McLaren to join Renault and taken the information with him.
"Ever since the matter was brought to our attention, we have acted with complete transparency towards McLaren and the FIA and we will continue to do so," A Renault spokesman said.
McLaren are remaining silent on the latest controversy to hit Formula One. "The team will not be making any comment on this matter," a spokesman said.
Meanwhile, McLaren confirmed the FIA visited their Woking headquarters as part of the investigation. Reports claimed world motor sport's governing body undertook a thorough examination of the state-of-the-art premises, including the team's 2008 car, and took with them data for further analysis.
The inspection was ordered after allegations that a McLaren employee, then-chief designer Mike Coughlan, was found to be in possession of confidential Ferrari information.
"We are unable to make any comment other than to say that an inspection has always been part of the WMSC decision, and of course we are co-operating fully with the FIA," a McLaren spokesperson said.
If inspectors find evidence of Ferrari technology on McLaren's new car, it could have serious implications for Lewis Hamilton's 2008 title bid.
"The investigation will be thorough," Max Mosley, the FIA president, said last week. "It will use outside experts and we will do everything we possibly can to make sure that either of the McLarens has no element of Ferrari intellectual property in it. If it does, we will then have to consider taking some sort of action.
"That would not necessarily be preventing them from running. It would be more likely that they would be given a negative point allocation."
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2005 / 55
£59,500
Great car insurance deals online
£Excellent+ executive benefits
Torres and Partners
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
Alstom Power
Europe
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Special Offers now available
At the new sophisticated
Encore Las Vegas Resort!
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
I suspect this case is not very similar to the Mclaren Mercedes case. In the case of Renault the team have gone from being world champions twice to a very poor performance this year. I doubt also that you will find all the stuff that was uncovered in the FIA second Mclaren Mercedes hearing. Furthermore to copy a car which is a Ferrari copy anyway seems strange indeed.
Mclaren Mercedes, on the contrary, had not won a world constructors championship for eight years (1998). Indeed in 1998 they also had a Mercedes engine. This was the only time since 1958 that a team with a Mercedes engine won a constructors championship. So to suddenly pop out and be very competitive was very curious.
Tetsuya, Tokyo, Japan
It's very curious that, after Grand Prix in Spa (Belgium), four months ago, McLaren denounced at Renault Team to FIA. And now, only now, four months after, It gives step to the complaint against Renault...
Does FIA need four months for studing that case? Or FIA had studied that case NOW because Alonso is on the verge of signing contract with Reanult?
Julio, Jaén, Spain
I have long supported Renault and I agree its time for FIArrari's factory to be inspected for the same reasons. Couglan alleged that FIArrari had some material from other teams and the FIA acknowledged themselves that FIArrari had an illegal car the first race. Why then did they not get banned?
Renault suffered last year at Monza with the ridiculous penalty on Alonso. This year is a farce FIArrari get away with everything.
Pierre, Brive,
Where will it end, and why did it begin? All the interlectual preperty issues seem to me to be about develoments that can't be seen in the pit lane. If a team adds fins or a new front spoiler, all of a sudden every team has them and no one bats an eyelid. If someone has the plans to a new undertray, all hell breaks loose. What's the difference? Why is it o.k. to copy something that is there for all to see, but not something hidden under the bodywork of the car? Also, to expect people to move from team to team without taking their expertise with them is nonsense. EG - If an engineer at Renault has worked out that a car will corner better with moveable balast, how can he be expected to ignore this inovation if he moves to Red Bull.
Dave Shenton, Crewe, UK
Renault - isn't that where Alonso has just gone? Controversy seems to follow him like a bad smell.
David Leslie, Perth, Scotland
Ferrari to McClaren. McClaren to Renault. Was it one of those circular e-mails? Where next? Pass it on.
Ron, Bedford, U.K.
P.S. Isn't Alonso going back to Renault from McClaren? He has to be number one suspect.
Ron, Bedford, U.K.
Spying in Formula 1 may be as common as doping is for other sports.
The great difference in McLaren's case is that they were caught while photocopying Ferrari's documents. It was hard proofed. The "spy scandal" brought by McLaren against Renault is full of hot air.
I think McLaren is just trying to say the following: "Even if our 2008 has some designs similar to those of Ferrari, if the R28 were to be checked, it would be be discovered some similar designs to McLaren's"... They just want to make sure their car is left untouched by the FIA.
BrainBQ, Madrid, Spain
Given the already admitted and acknowledged long term relationship and communications between current and ex Ferrari, Renault and Maclaren engineers, I can understand the need for workshop inspections. I do not understand why this is limited to Maclaren. Surely these, albeit unethical, relationships could just as easily passed Maclaren information to Ferrari or Ferrari data to Renault. In the interests of even-handedness I think Ferrari premises should also be inspected along with Maclaren and Renault.
Jonathan Mills, Brighton,