Ben Smith
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes

The controversial decision to strip Lewis Hamilton of victory in the Belgian Grand Prix has been met with blanket bemusement in the media with Niki Lauda, the former Formula One world champion, describing it as "the worst judgement in the history of F1".
Just two hours after one of Formula One’s classic finishes, Hamilton was denied victory by a hugely controversial retrospective punishment by the race stewards in Spa. Lauda, a former Ferrari world champion, told Bild, the German newspaper, that not only had Hamilton driven brilliantly, but that he had not contravened the rules and deserved his victory.
"This is the worst judgement in the history of F1," he said. "It's absolutely unacceptable when three (stewards) influence the championship like this."
In Britain the press reaction has been equally damning. In the Daily Mail, Jonathan McEvoy says the 23-year-old McLaren driver has been the "victim of a conspiracy against McLaren", with the FIA heading a "polluted sport". In The Independent David Tremayne describes the decision to demote Hamilton from first to third as one "that will be long remembered as being farcical and disgraceful by all in motor racing."
In The Daily Telegraph, Simon Arron says "the action was beguiling, the final result was bewildering," while in the Daily Express Bob Mckenzie says "the puppeteers of the FIA have pulled the strings and made Lewis Hamilton and his McLaren team dance to Ferrari's tune".
In the Daily Mirror, Byron Young says the sport is "back in the dock" after Hamilton was "robbed of one of the greatest victories of his career". He added: "As he drove away from Spa-Francorchamps after another tawdry episode in the sport's history the 23-year-old must have wondered what he will have to do to win this world title."
"That same old stench," Young says, "mars the sport and turns fans away. That ruins the efforts of even the best competitors, taints the day and leaves fans wondering what exactly they are 'fans' of."
Around the majority of the world the decision has been met with a equal bemusement, however in Italy, the home of Ferrari, the reaction has been very different.
Gazzetta Dello Sport say "Hamilton penalised!", and go on to justify the decision to punish the McLaren-Mercedes driver.
The Italian newspaper says, "It's true that he let Raikkonen go first on the straight, but because he immediately passed him, he ended up gaining an advantage and therefore, he has been penalised. In order to consider his actions a regular pass over Raikkonen, he should have waited at least another turn rather than attacking so soon."
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Lets not forget why LH was in that situation, he was racing, KR blocked his previous overtaking manoeuvre forcing LH to go off the track.
I think that is how Lauda sees it and I wonder what Stewart and Moss make of it all?
Jim Leasor, Harrogate, England
F1.
Now the Number One Farcical show - it's no longer meant to be a race for God's sake it's a time trial followed by a parade: your finishing position determined by Q3 and the ability of your pit crew to keep you there.Overtaking is far too dangerous and contravenes the Marinello Convention.
Jim Leasor, Harrogate, England
So he should've waited at least another corner to overtake should he? Ok so why not 2 corners after, or even 3, or how about half way round turn 4 - are we making the rules up as we go along? he gained advantage, but he gave it back - easy for all these people to criticise his actions in retrospect
Ben, Romford,
-yes it was fantastic racing-but i've been a fan along time now, and to beat ferrari takes more than overtaking one on the track. he had Raikers beat-all he had to do was hang back another corner and i would't be writing this.
to be a champion requires brains and speed.
you quiters-check out '76..
ian, wakefield, uk
F1 chicanes are too forgiving. Had Hamilton been forced to abort the overtake sooner; or had he smashed a wing on rough terrain; then there would be no need for steward intervention. Let the circuit & drivers decide the result. If a chicane can be short-cut, cut it.
Mick W, Emerald,
I have been a keen fan of formula one for a good number of years. Never have I been so outraged by the FIA in making such a poor decision that not only will effect the world championship but the morale of Mclaren and also the enjoyement of watching the sport. A very disapointed F1 fan.
William Duke, Rotherham,
Please. Take a look on Suzuka 2005 and Alonso jumping the chicane and overpassing Webber or Klein. He let him pass and overpass again in the straigth.
The team ordered Alonso to let Webber pass again, because stewards were analizing if Alonso had had advantage.
The case is the same of Hamilton.
Javier, Cartagena, Spain
So "world press" means "english-speaking--press". SouthAmerican and not-English European press do not see things as you are telling us. Mostlyy said that Hamilton should give more room to Kimi in order to avoid penalization.
Angiox, Madrid, Spain
Lewis had a nose on Raikkonen thus the position. Lewis clearly gave the position back. Im in my second year of following F1, unnecessary judgments like this forces me to wonder were is the spirit of competition. They gave F1 the most exciting finish I have seen and this is the way it is rewarded
Jeff, Kailua HI, USA
I could not believe this when i heard it. I have been a devoted fan for 17 years and never listened to people that say F1 is 'fixed' i now believe this is a very real possibility. This decision is a very sad day for true racers and for the entire sport in general. This decison has no justification.
Jon, Home, England
FIA could kill real racing. Everyone wants more tension, lots of passing and uncertainty. Many of us pray for rain since it is such a huge challenge to the drivers. Spa was boring until the last few laps- then it became great. Aggressive, real competition will vanish if they are not thoughtful.
Frank, Denver, USA
Should the race been in its 20th lap, would Lewis been penalised by a stop and go or whatever...
Carlos Pereira, Sao Paulo, Brazil
To paraphrase Gary Lineker; F1 is a sport where 22 cars drive around a track and then Ferrari win.
Brad Lambert, Heathfield, UK
What do you expect?F1 is run by Ferrari.
Andy, Bristol, UK
James walters what are you talking about!! did you see the race?
JB, manchester,
walter, surely you meant 'reserved' and not 'deserve'
g.osullivan, basildon, england
Out of all the opinions voiced,one dominates them all and commands our respectful ear. What Niki Lauda says damns the stewards and the sport as they and it are currently operating.
The stewards should be publicly named and shamed then dismissed,but only after they have apologised to ALL the drivers
keith Robotham, Dalsland, Sweden
Although the British press may say this is one of the worst judgments ever made in the sport im sure if it were the other way around and Kimi Raikkonen had done this to win the race we would all be backing them for that. At the end of the day it was a cheeky and unsporting move.
James Walters, Wolverhampton, Staffordshire
Plus everyone knows how superior Lewis is in the wet, what is he suposed to do its a race or has the FIA got used to the procession that used to be the norm behind a Ferrari. Are they going to bring in a new rule that you can't overtake under braking. Pathetic.
paul, Doncaster,
Italian do it better... Ferrari and Massa deserve World Championship
walter, Harwich,
"Anti McClaren? Or is F1 instituionally racist?"
Neither, it's Pro-Ferrari. Fernando Alonso routinely had to overcome the FIA's farcical rulings to steal two world championships from them while he was driving a Renault. Lewis will have to do the same in his McLaren.
Kev, York,
Why shouldn't he be penalized ? He cut short a corner because of which he came closer to Kimi because of which he could challenge Kimi for position and because of which Kimi couldn't finish the race. So all in all the penalty is what he deserved .
Pranab, Bangalore, India
Regarding Lewis gaining an advantage by having more momentum than Kimi: This is simply wrong. Lewis led by a cars length exiting the chicane. Lewis backed off whilst Kimi accelerated past. Kimi had a 6 Kph passing speed over Lewis with a cars length between the cars, the same as there was prior to the chicane. Lewis slip-stream passed was absolutely fine.
Leon Thompson, Stebbing, Essex
"Are the stuards correct or are they just going by the rules as written? "
It's open to interpretation. When Schumacher used the same move repeatedly in one race at Hungary in 2006, but without conceding any advantage gained, he wasn't penalised. But he was of course driving a Ferrari at the time.
Kev, York,
A lot has been said about the decisions of the stewards. Yes, its been observed that in the past Ferrari have been given an helping hand with controversial decisions but at times the criticism is taken a bit too far sometimes even in situation where the rule books fail to clarify. Sad but true !!
Pankaj, Thane, India
I have been watching F1 all my life and I'm 55.
However, I've pretty much had enough of it now. What was once a great and entertaining sport is no more. It is purely politics and the sport aspect only comes second to this. How the FIA are going to justify this incredible decision will interesting!!!
Chris, Peacehaven, UK
On the other hand it's sparked some media interest and headlines for what is otherwise officially the worlds dullest sport.
Formula one, a race to the first corner followed by 56 parade laps!
James, Devon, UK
Message to Ron Dennis: Paint the cars red and put a sticker of a horse on them! Robbed again and not for the first time this season.
Robin, Cambridge, England
Times on line:
Post the actual section in the rules which was used by the stuards to come to there conclution - this would be interesting reading, afteral this is what should decide it , not just the stuards decision. Are the stuards correct or are they just going by the rules as written?
Phil Hayes, Frodsham, cheshire
I have watched Formula one for 45 years. Not any more. The title chase is now fixed. The stewards were obviously in the Ferrari hospitality tent when the incident took place!!
Nick Andrews, Ipswich, England
Anti McClaren? Or is F1 instituionally racist?
Craig T, Surby, IOM
Best Finish of the year spoiled by officials!
Peter, Johannesburg,
A HARSH decision. I can see why they did it but it is VERY harsh. The rules say he had to "conceed" the place and he didnt really do that but HARSH. Did I mention it was harsh?
Kevin.
Kevin McGoldrick, Guernsey,
Ferrari would never have been penalised like that. Just because Raikkonen couldn't drive as well as Hamilton, Ferrari have to cheat to get the result. There should be a new race formed without Ferrari and the other Mafia members. When will the F1 have the guts to stand up to the Crooked infiltration
GT, Swindon, England