Times Online
Win VIP tickets
McLaren have confirmed they will appeal the controversial decision to strip Lewis Hamilton of victory in Sunday's Belgian Grand Prix.
The Briton was demoted from first to third after receiving a retrospective 25-second drive-through penalty that meant a potential world championship lead of eight points was cut to two over the eventual race winner, Felipe Massa.
The matter will now go before the International Court of Appeal, who will initially determine whether McLaren's protest is legal. If there is a case to answer, they will then assess the verdict of the three-man panel of stewards who handed down the penalty.
Martin Whitmarsh, the chief executive officer of McLaren, said: "Following our decision to register our intention to appeal the penalty handed out to Lewis Hamilton by the FIA stewards at the 2008 Belgian Grand Prix, we hereby confirm we have now lodged notice of appeal."
The incident occurred at the end of lap 42 of the 44-lap race, with Hamilton cutting the final corner after being blocked by Ferrari's Kimi Raikkonen as he attempted to pass the Finn around the outside. Returning to the Spa track along the start-finish straight, the 23-year-old temporarily held the lead before correctly handing it back to Raikkonen down the pit straight.
Timing sheets indicate Raikkonen crossed the start-finish line 0.6sec ahead of Hamilton, with further data showing the 23-year-old was also 6km/h slower at that point. Hamilton then filed behind Raikkonen, before legitimately passing him again on the run down to the first corner.
In wet conditions, the lead then changed hands twice more on the penultimate lap prior to Raikkonen spinning into a wall, handing Hamilton the win that was taken away by the stewards two hours later.
"In the closing stages of the race I was catching Kimi consistently, lap by lap, and with three laps remaining I got close enough to attempt to overtake him on the entry to the last chicane," Hamilton said. "I managed to get slightly ahead of him in the braking area for the first apex of the chicane. He fought back approaching the second apex but, in doing so, he left no room for me on the inside line.
"The only way for me to avoid a collision was therefore to cut inside the second apex. I came out of the second apex in front of Kimi and so I momentarily lifted-off on the straight, to ensure Kimi got back in front.
"The team also came on the radio and instructed me to allow Kimi to re-pass, which I had already done. As a result, Kimi crossed the start-finish line ahead of me.
"After allowing Kimi to completely re-pass, I crossed from the left side of the track to the right side of the track, passing behind Kimi in the process. I then attacked Kimi on the inside of the first corner, and successfully out-braked him."
Whitmarsh added: "From the pit wall, we then asked Race Control to confirm they were comfortable Lewis had allowed Kimi to re-pass. They confirmed twice that they believed the position had been given back in a manner that was 'okay'.
"If Race Control had instead expressed any concern regarding Lewis's actions at that time, we would have instructed Lewis to allow Kimi to re-pass for a second time."
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£23,093 - £56,211
The Office for National Statistics
Newport, South Wales
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Yes yes. Hamilton was on charge, and for sure could it win. But the maneuver was wrong. Luc has right. Raikonen was in front and has racing line. He closed the door for Hamilton.H let R again in front but from the racing line. So R has to break on wet. This is correct?
C.M., Timisoara,
its a con.its ok for the ferrari to do it but seeing as its a maclaren they get a penalty.couple weeks ago it was to late in the race for massa to recieve a penalty got away with a fine after the race.the fia are in favour of ferrari and will do anything to see them take the title.
dan, cornwall, england
Lewis cutting the corner and gaining any advantage, became academic when Kimi crashed. So it is more a question of what advantage did he gain over a then 3rd placed Massa, who was well back, by about 15 seconds. Because this is ultimately what the penalty is saying. And to that answer, it is, none.
Pete, Earlestown, UK
As far as I know the rules state that you are not allowed to gain an advantage by cutting the corner. As Lewis then slowed down and allowed him to overtake, then even passed behind him and overtook him I cannot see what kind of panel could then take away his race win.
Rob, Willington, England
Lewis was the fastest driver after the rain began and Kimi closed the door on Lewis first time he made to overtake; pushed off the road by Kimi and thus cutting the corner, Lewis restored Kimi's lead, but it was inevitable that Lewis would win. The stewarts decision was bizarre and should not stand
Edwin Fleming, Portstewart, Northern Ireland
I believe the video evidence shows Hamilton was clearly in the wrong. He was not the lead driver into the chicane as he did not have the racing line. He chose to cut the corner rather than break and follow Kimi - therefore he gained an unfair advantage.
Boris, Edinburgh,
@ Luc - "video in youtube shows that Hamilton choose to cut the chicane, he was not put wide"
Luca, please try to be accurate. Your assertion is untrue. The video clearly shows that Kimi put his car into Hamilton's braking zone, thereby forcing Lewis to cut the corner to avoid an accident.
Alastair, Alicante, Spain
Who is in charge of the race?
Race Control or the Stewards??
louis, Liverpool, UK
New video in youtube shows that Hamilton choose to cut the chicane, he was not put wide. His on board camera shows that Kimi was already in front of him as he deliberaly drives to the left. More fairness and less complain. ttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bbpLUZlV-A4
Luc, Tarragona, Spain
seems like an open and shut case. I think we all know that if the situation had been reversed, hamilton would have been banned for running raikkonen off the side of the chicane in the first place.
jem, london, uk
It can't be allowed to stand...surely. But I've said this incredulous line several times with regard to the FIA playing God and making it up as it goes along over the past couple of seasons so I won't hold my breath....
Richard Mee, Cambridge, UK