Martin Brundle at Monza
Win VIP tickets

In textbook sports psychology style Lewis Hamilton arrived in Monza saying he felt as pumped and motivated as if he were coming off the back of a “victory” last weekend, regardless of the stewards’ decision to penalise him 25 seconds for missing part of the final chicane at Spa and dropping him to third place. That demeanour will have changed after a dismal qualifying performance caused by an over-confident tyre choice during bouts of heavy rain in the second session yesterday. He starts 15th, but that’s not the whole story. Even after the correct “full wet” tyres had been bolted on, unlike championship rival Felipe Massa, he was still unable to find the necessary pace in conditions in which he normally excels.
The only saving grace for Hamilton is that an equally underwhelming Kimi Raikkonen could manage only 14th, although Ferrari teammate Massa, who sits two points behind Hamilton for the championship, lines up a solid if unspectacular sixth. Raikkonen has announced an extension to his Ferrari contract until the end of 2010. Surely part of that agreement is that he will support Massa’s title challenge for the rest of this year if required. Raikkonen looks like the perfect rear-gunner, and the inevitable concertina into turn one, wet or dry, will present a peril for him and Hamilton.
Yesterday was a chance for the underdogs, although that word doesn’t justify the brilliant performance of 21-year-old Sebastian Vettel, who became the youngest pole-sitter in Formula One history, with the smallest team on the grid, Toro Rosso. He also tops the speed traps, which tells us that he has a full dry set-up too.
Another stand-out performance came from McLaren’s Heikki Kovalainen, who starts second, having always appeared to be more comfortable than Hamilton. Possibly the most impressive lap was from third-placed Mark Webber. In ever-more treacherous conditions he strung together a stunning lap in the closing seconds, placing him ahead of an impressive Sebastien Bourdais in the second Toro Rosso. Nico Rosberg confirmed Williams’s pace here with a respectable fifth. Sadly, Jenson Button starts on the back row, in 19th.
Hamilton must feel down on his luck. Last weekend at Spa was the most exciting race the sport has seen for years, a Ferrari and McLaren banging wheels for the world championship, the outcome in doubt into the closing laps, two of the finest drivers slugging it out in the most challenging circumstances imaginable on the calendar’s most demanding track. It was a stunningly exciting spectacle. The subsequent decision to penalise Hamilton poured cold water all over the enraged fans.
Were the stewards right in investigating Hamilton’s move? Absolutely. Most of the drivers agree that he gained an advantage by taking the escape road rather than fully negotiating the corner. Hamilton is a bit too fast and talkative to garner much support from his envious rivals, although they mostly thought the penalty was harsh.
Did the stewards reach the correct decision? From on-board footage, it is clear Hamilton didn’t make an initial overtaking manoeuvre into the chicane; it was a necessary avoidance, because Raikkonen was early on the brakes and only Hamilton’s lightning reactions prevented a huge shunt. Ever the opportunist, he converted this into an overtaking manoeuvre, at which point Raikkonen got off the brakes and reclaimed the apex, legitimately taking the Briton wide. There was a split second when the McLaren could have braked and slotted back in behind the Ferrari, but the man is a pure racer and there is a championship at stake here, after all.
Hamilton took as little of the run-off as possible, given the high concrete inner kerb, but still exited the corner ahead. He blended out of the throttle, allowed Raikkonen fully past, switched sides, travelling 4mph slower, then nailed him into La Source hairpin with the kind of braking superiority just witnessed into the chicane. Hamilton had been significantly faster during the previous lap too, so he had the tyre temperature and confidence to pass the now-struggling Finn easily.
And that is the critical point for me. It was speed superiority that saw him past the Ferrari, not the already given-up advantage from the final corner. The conditions weren’t factored in by the stewards. Hindsight says that Hamilton should have waited a corner, but what if a safety car had been deployed for another rainy incident?
There has now been a clarification that drivers cannot overtake into the next corner in such circumstances, rather confirming that it wasn’t a prior specific or unwritten agreement.
I am not pro-McLaren or pro-Lewis. Or anti-Ferrari. I’m pro-F1. I don’t care who wins, as long as it’s the best driver — and as long as it’s a level playing field. I have had my concerns about that since the illegal/legal Ferrari bargeboard in Malaysia 1999.
Critically, McLaren were apparently told twice by Spa race director Charlie Whiting, the only official line of communication they have during a race, that he was satisfied with the way Hamilton had given the place back. For the highly respected Whiting to have been overridden by the stewards is disturbing. Have these men ever driven or been involved in high-level motorsport? Have they been around Spa at speed? We all want consistency, transparency and speed in these matters, and something must change.
There is a precedent. In Japan in 2005 Fernando Alonso immediately repassed Christian Klien’s Jaguar in a similar manner. The race director forced him to let Klien past for a second time. On the other hand, Michael Schumacher was not penalised for maintaining position with a high-speed trip through the run-off area in Hungary 2006 because “he was ahead in the braking area”. So was Hamilton.
So what’s the solution? At Monza the first chicane run-off features sleeping policemen, a slalom and grass. The second chicane is much more open. There could be a safely located “penalty box” where the drivers must momentarily stop. The bottom line is that the track is clearly defined between two solid white lines, but you’ll see numerous transgressions today.
I suspect Hamilton will not get those points back, which adds extra importance and pressure to his performance today from that lowly grid slot.
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£23,093 - £56,211
The Office for National Statistics
Newport, South Wales
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Hamilton didn't cut the corner you twits, he was pushed onto the run off area at the chicane by who else? who guessed it... Raikkonen in a Ferrari.
John, Yorkshire, UK
At least it might be worth watching todays race.
Ben Stiles, London, UK
Hamilton did nothing wrong... he is no different than Ferrari's golden boy schumacher. Ferrari are the biggest cry-babies! I dont know what they will do because this must be the last decision going in their favour! Lewis will break schumacher records and he is going to kill ferrari over years to com
Peter Parker, munich , Germany
Grow up. Hamilton was rightly punished and that's the end of the matter. You say whether the stewards have any driving experience. Well in most sports not all 'referrees' need be former players and same is the case with F1.
Sushant Pandit, Delhi, India
Once respected? In 2007 he was the culprit in the safety car, tow-truck, Kimi's fast lap, and extra Brazil-tyres incidents (no penalties), more than ALL other drivers together!
today in Italy he tried to push Glock and Webber off track. I dont care who wins this year, so long as it isn' t Hamilton
Tetsuya, Tokyo, Japan
What a woeful analysis. Not pro Mclaren or anti Ferrari? Didn't come across that way, Mr. Brundle. What's so critical about Charlie Whiting's confirmation after Hamilton has committed the error? In this case it's not up to him to make the call but the stewards. You didn't know that?
Karlie, Singapore,
I also saw Coultard's German television interview John Walter, Bonn, Germany.
As someone who is not a particular fan of Lewis Hamilton, can say I had more the impression of an embittered, once respected, driver making himself important with an on screen sound bite than any thing else.
Francesca, Munich, Germany
Stephen UK
A lot of people boycotting. Gosh you must have a lot of friends!
drumsfeldd, London, uk
At Monaco the drivers know the penalty for straying off the track, they hit the Armco.
Change the rules so that a driver gets a automatic drive-through if all 4 wheels go over the white lines that are either side of the track, and if it happens on the last lap they get 25 seconds added to their time
Bob , Wokingham,
Most drivers agree and Brundle should listen to the comment by Coultard, made on German television - namely that Hamilton cut the corner then slipstreamed the Ferrari to very quickly gain the lead. Hamilton maintained his false advantage. In other words he didn't fairly hand back the lead.
John Walter, bonn, germany
Typically British thinking the whole world is against you not knowing that you caused the problem yourselves. Did he cut the chicane - yes. Was there an advantage - yes. Unfortunately you lot forgot how Lewis took out Kimi in Canada and none of you battered an eyelid. Fair was it?
Warren, Abu Dhabi, UAE
Lewis Hamilton did not break the rules at the time. The 25-second penalty was wrong and should be overturned and Hamilton's full 10-points properly re-instated.
Antonio da Silva, Durban, South Africa
Dear Mr. Brundle, you are concerned about a level playing field since the bargboard controversy of 1999. What an hypocrisy! What about Colin Chapman and the mini-skirts? Going around the rules seems a British specialty more than Italian, as last year scandal clearly demonstrate
paolo secondo, new york, usa
There are an awful lot of people boycotting F1 because of the points deduction against Hamilton and that will devalue the advertising value of F1, not just to the TV companies, but the sponsors of the teams themselves. I shall not be watching Monza.
Stephen, St. Ives, England