Edward Gorman, Motor Racing Correspondent
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes

Bernie Ecclestone, the Formula One commercial rights-holder, launched a stinging attack on Luca di Montezemolo yesterday, effectively telling the Ferrari president to mind his own business, in the wake of the latter’s criticisms of the way Ecclestone is running the sport.
Speaking at the Ferrari factory in Maranello, Italy, this week, Di Montezemolo said that Formula One was not being run in what he called a “normal” manner, that the sport did not need a “dictator”, in a remark taken as a reference to Ecclestone, and that teams wanted more of the sport’s vast income and greater transparency from Ecclestone about the extent of that money. “We want to know more about the revenues,” he said.
An angry Ecclestone told The Times that Di Montezemolo should be the last person to be complaining about how much income the teams receive. “The only thing he has not mentioned is the extra money Ferrari get above all the other teams and all the extra things Ferrari have had for years – the ‘general help’ they are considered to have had in Formula One,” Ecclestone said.
It has always been known that Ferrari, whose presence on the grid is regarded as critical to the success and prestige of the championship, are on a special deal with Ecclestone’s company and get more money than their rivals. But Ecclestone put a figure on that for the first time yesterday, something that could be designed to drive a wedge between the Scuderia and the other teams.
“Ferrari get so much more money than everyone else,” he said. “They know exactly what they get, they are not that stupid, although they are not that bright, either. They get about $80 million (about £54 million) more. When they win the constructors’ championship, which they did this year, they got $80 million more than if McLaren had won it.”
Ecclestone added that the special deal with the Italian sports car manufacturer goes back to the attempt by the teams to form a breakaway championship in 2003, when Ferrari were the first to return to the fold. “They were the only team that broke ranks with the other manufacturers – why did they break ranks?” he said. “That’s where the $80 million comes in. We ‘bought’ Ferrari. We ‘bought’ Ferrari’s loyalty. Our deal with Ferrari was that we ‘bought’ them so they would not go to the others.”
Di Montezemolo’s call for more transparency about the huge annual income of Formula One was interpreted by Ecclestone as a thinly veiled attack on his business ethics. He said that since the first formal deal under which the teams race was signed, in 1981, the so-called Concorde Agreement, they have had the right to examine the finances of the business. “They have the right to send people into the company and search for everything,” Ecclestone said. “Ferrari in particular, more than anybody, from day one, have had the right and they’ve never done it. We have bankers here and we’ve got CVC (CVC Capital Partners, the principal owners of Formula One) checking every single solitary thing. So anybody that starts saying that we’ve done anything wrong, I’ll sue the a*** off them.”
As far as Di Montezemolo’s ambition to wrest more money for the teams from Ecclestone, the 78-year-old billionaire cast doubt on the chances of him agreeing to meeting in the new year to discuss this. Previously he had suggested that the teams should get less income, not more, in the light of the recent cost-cutting deal concluded with the FIA. He had a different idea yesterday. “What he should do, rather than asking for money, with all the extra money Ferrari gets, he should share all that amongst the teams,” Ecclestone said of Di Montezemolo.
The Ferrari president levelled a number of specific charges against Ecclestone, among them the decision to cancel the Canadian Grand Prix, which Di Montezemolo said he had found out about in the newspapers.
Once again the pugilistic Formula One official was having none of it. “The reason the Canadian Grand Prix is finished has been discussed with all the teams, including him, and it was agreed that what Canada was paying was nowhere near enough,” Ecclestone said.
In a final thought, he suggested that the Ferrari president knows less about his company than his own employees. “It’s a shame he’s not in touch with people that seem to run the company as opposed to what he does – work as a press officer,” Ecclestone said.
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Why would the FIA help Ferrari collect an extra 80 million?
Colin Johnson, Benoni, South Africa
I'm not sure how Bernie thinks this revelation hurts Ferrari. It's he himself who offered them the "special deal".
To me, it makes Ecclestone look like someone who will do anything to keep his cash cow, level playing field be damned. What team wouldn't have taken an extra $80 million?
Dennis Vitolo, Harview Eastern, USA
If this was a post-race interview, here is the F1 way to put it:
"I think Bernie did a great job. His team did a great job. Ferrari, also, they did a great job. Honda, they maybe didn't do a great job. Di Montezemolo, he did a great job sometimes. And other times, maybe he didn't do a great job."
iain, bedford, uk
F1 needs a major clearout. Too many people have been at the helm, whether it be Bernie, Mosley, FIA members and some team owners, for far too long. In some cases, 40 years or more! As a result there is too much vested interest to want to make significant changes that will benefit the 'sport'.
Colin, Brisbane, Australia
I totally agree with the sentiment to go watch Superbikes and MotoGP - more overtaking in one lap than a whole F1 GP. The riders are more aproachable and ability is the biggest factor, not money.
Martin, Bath, UK
F1 has been manipulated for years and years. And years.
And you've only just realised?
I think the whole thing is funny; amazingly dull on-track action, prima donna drivers, billionaire munchkins. Robo drivers, all truly laughable.
Go watch Superbikes and MotoGP - thats where the action is.
Mark Bullen, Kiama, Aus
World War III is upon us.
Gloves. Off.
Let's get it ON!
Anthony, London,
The sad British F1 plight, always looking for an excuse why they've been hard done by and why they think Lewis Hamilton is the best driver in the World. The reality is that Ferrari are worse off in this situation, and the change in the points structure has only hindered them since its inception.
Philip, Sydney, Australia
General help? Australia 2007 illegal red car? lewis Hamilton double world champ by now?
Rich, Oxford, England
Just as well Lewis won the championship this year, clearly no-one wil be allowed to stop Ferrari winning next year
David, St Albans, UK
"If you think that senario back through this season, was Lewis Hamilton World Champion several races before Brazil? "
Paul, Newton Abbot.
I think he might have been Champion in 2007 if Ferrari hadn't had 'general help'.
McFerrari, Scranton, NJ, US
I'd say Ferrari have had 'general help' since before 2003. Take a look at the constructors points for 2001 & 2002 seasons!
Phil , Atlanta, USA
What, you mean Ferrari get a better deal than the other teams? Perhaps they made him an offer he couldn't refuse!
al, weybridge, UQ
Um, am I missing something? Isn't he saying that they have to pay Ferrari $80M more 'prize money' if they win the constructors championship than if another team wins it? Wouldn't this then be a dis-incentive to 'let' Ferrari win through any 'general help'? Ferrari wins Bernie pays out $80M more.
Tim, Oxford, UK
get rid of ferrari. They are a boring team with boring drivers and an unfair advantage.
jon antony, london, United Kingdom
Looks like F1 is heading for a split again.. Also Bernie is implying Ferrari are doing something wrong. But I am sorry, its his company that dangled the $80m carrot because Bernie knows the value of Ferrari. No Ferrari and F1 fans might as well all go home. So please don't try to pass the buck here
A. Khan, London,
Is that why Hamilton lost last year through heavy penalties so that Ferrari can win.
The question that needs investigating is whether the races are manipulated.
nayef, shanghai, china
General help?,
What is that exactly?, for years everyone except the blind tifosi knew there was a Ferrari bias, now Gollum confirms it!,
No more F1 for me , not until the present rulers shuffle off.
Ross Cattrell, Montreal, Canada
This "arrangement" is common knowledge and was in place way before 2003; what the article fails to mention is that the deal also includes a unilateral Ferrari veto over any new sporting regulations they don't like. And by the way, his real name is Montezemolo, not "di" Montezemolo.
Alastair Johnson, Alicante, Spain
I totally agree with Simon
If you think that senario back through this season, was Lewis Hamilton World Champion several races before Brazil?
Its a long and dark shadow this " General Help"
One thing I do beleve is that for his wet Silverstone performance Lewis secured his place as an F1 legend
Paul, Newton Abbot, Devon
What a horrible bunch of people in F1 - Ecclestone the billionaire pockets millions for doing what and the playing field is totally uneven with Ferrari getting more than everyone else for the same result how is that fair?
If circuits don't pay Bernie enough they lose the grand prix & sod the fans
Andrew, Cambridge,
I used to consider this fellow a gentleman - how vulgar! And how childish! At 78!
Surely, at this level, there must be a more dignified way to sort out incomprehensions between elders. Who else is left in F1 to inspire? What a disappointment!
A Davidson, Leeds,
I've watched F1 since I was a kid. This is one last and major nail into the coffin of the sport for me. I love Ferrari, I love F1. It's not the money that worries me, it's the extra 'general help'. So which race was real, which pit-lane fine was motivated by something other than racing? i'm out!
Simon, London, England
Extra money for Ferarri; is not surprising but it would be interesting to know what Bernie Eccelstone is referring to when he say's "all the extra things Ferrari have had for years the general help they are considered to have had in Formula One, I'll leave that to the readers imagination.
Keith Hollinrake, Penang, Malaysia
Oops, the truth is out. Do anything to keep Ferrari happy, and we thought that there was a level playing field or did we?
Bill-from-Brum, Brum, UK
What was it that George Orwell wrote in Animal Farm?
All pigs are equal, but some are more equal than others!
I wonder if the Ferrari Red now signifies embarrassment that their 'special deal' has come to light?
John Clark, Northampton, UK
If what Eccelstone says about Ferrari receiving $80M is true, how can fans ever believe they are watching a contest on a level playing field between competing teams? It's a charade. The team with the most money will always have a better chance of winning the championship. Incredible!
Art Folker, Menlo Park, USA