Rick Broadbent, Athletics Correspondent
Win a fitness package worth more than £3,000

Dwain Chambers was named in the Great Britain team for the World Indoor Championships in Valencia yesterday, but there was no attempt to brush his past under the welcome mat as UK Athletics (UKA) made it clear that the sprinter was not wanted.
The governing body admitted that it was shackled by its selection criteria and had no choice but to pick a man who won the 60 metres at the trials on Sunday. It then launched an astonishing attack on the former European champion, who completed a two-year doping ban in 2005, accusing him of denying up-and-coming athletes a place in the team. “The committee was unanimous in its desire not to select Dwain,” a UKA statement read after the six-man committee had named him in the first wave of picks.
It will go down in sporting history as one of the most begrudging call-ups of all time. No sooner had UKA accepted that its refusal to select the winner of the trials would have resulted in a High Court writ from Chambers’s lawyer than it said that the athlete would not be invited to its showpiece meeting on Saturday, the Norwich Union Indoor Grand Prix in Birmingham. “It’s like having a party and we can invite who we want,” a UKA spokesman said.
Jon Ridgeon, managing director of Fast Track, the event promoters, said: “Both UKA and Fast Track do not want the world’s No 1 indoor meet to be overshadowed by this issue.”
Chambers admitted last night that he was “being made to feel like a leper”. He added: “A terrible stigma has been attached to me but people need to know I am clean. Yes, I did something wrong, I did the crime — but I’ve done my time and moved on.”
The UKA statement read: “It is extremely frustrating to leave young athletes at home; eligible for Beijing, in possession of the qualifying standard and committed to ongoing participation in a drug-free sport. In contrast, we have to take an individual whose sudden return . . . suggests that he may be using the whole process for his own ends.”
That reflected the panel’s suspicion that Chambers may not last long in the sport and will find sympathetic promoters hard to come by. Also included in the team was Carl Myerscough, a shot-putter who has served a ban for taking steroids.
Chambers, 29, was considering last night whether to challenge the British Olympic Association (BOA) life ban automatically issued to doping offenders. Nick Collins, his lawyer, said: “We will have that conversation at some stage, but it’s been a case of ‘let’s get him in the team and take it from there.’ ” The BOA said that it will vigorously contest any challenge.
UKA’s main gripe is that Chambers has had only one drugs test in more than a year. However, it was the governing body’s decision to remove him from UK Sport’s out-of-competition register when he pursued an ill-fated career in American football at the end of 2006. The IAAF, the world governing body, has since confirmed that Chambers did not officially retire and has endorsed his comeback.
Although Chambers was recalled to the Britain team in 2006 after his ban expired, Dave Collins, the UKA performance director, said that there “had been a hardening of the stance throughout the sport. This is about what athletics needs to do to . . . reassure the public that when they see a performance they are seeing a kosher one.”
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip

Find tickets for:
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2006
£10,750
Great car insurance deals online
£Excellent+ executive benefits
Torres and Partners
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
Alstom Power
Europe
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Great Investment, River Views
Special Offers now available
At the new sophisticated
Encore Las Vegas Resort!
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Several readers have questioned the glaring difference in the manner in which Dwain Chambers and Carl Myerscough have been treated. Well we've seen this before, last season in fact. Christine Ohuruogu was the victim of a massive negative newspaper campaign for coming back after serving a ban for missing a drug tests whilst Tim Don the British World Triathlon champion, who was in a similar situation was ignored.
Well folks there is a pattern here but few observers seem able to bring themselves to admit it. I'm sure we'll see a few more examples in the next few years.
Ray, Brussel, Belguim
It would be good example to all for Dwain to perform and win without the aid of drugs. What better statement than this to prove that drugs are not needed to win. It's a shame that the punishment though served, is not seen as sufficent by some holier than thou self righteous bigots. Dwain is by no means a saint & neither are we. If anyone is looking for one, they got to wait for the second coming. All athletes take drugs be they illegal or legal. The line is fine and the benfits very dubious. Most of the winning actually is in the head and the heart. I would love it if he could win.
Levison Hwaire, Birmingham,
I don't understand the furore over Chambers' participation; Myerscough was also banned for taking performance enhancing substances and no-one has even mentioned it (this would seem to de-bunk the argument that it's only because he's keeping out young british athletes who could go to the olympics)
the other main focus seems to be that Chambers is an "admitted" drug cheat, as if that makes it worse; admitting you have done wrong, and showing repentance, is surely better than hollow excuses and more deceit.
CD_13, London,
Isn't this just a matter of standards? If it is unacceptable to use drugs to enhance performance (and I think it is generally agreed that it is) and if our sportsmen represent the country (and by extension all of us) what message does it give that we tolerate a drugs cheat in our country's colours, and what does it say about Chambers that he uses the law to enforce his selection when he has forfeited the right to wear his country's colours and represent us? No person who has been caught using performance enhancing substances should ever be allowed to race in his / her country's colours again - while a person who has been imprisoned for an offence 'serves his time' it is unlikely that he will ever be allowed the opportunity to offend again if it is possible to keep him away from the occasion of his offence.
P Bird, Kingston upon Thames,
Many national & international sports bodies find themselves able to ignore concepts of natural justice & human rights. Little allowance is made for the fact that many professional athletes have not had much education & easy prey for those who promote the use of drugs in sport. I ndividuals who, mostly do not have the ability to fight back, are easy to villify and much less risky for officials than identifying the criminal elements who are actually involved in supplying the drugs. Using performance enhancing drugs in sport is a type of theft , but since it happens in a game it is not thought appropriate that it incurs real judicial penalties. However it seems UK Athletics can impose penalties greater than would be incurred from killing someone by dangerous driving or the incompetent management of Northern Rock . If UK Athletics had its way Dwain Chambers would never work again, this seems mostly because of honesty about his own drugs use and his assertion that others still do it
Clif, Belmont Tramonet,
Done the time!! What does this mean. Let's have a free for all. Competitions should be open to all. The druggies will lose in the end by an early death.
Akbar, Cambridge , UK
Why don't UKA just ask Dwayne to take a drug test? Surely he'd understand the situation and comply.
If I was Dwayne I'd be mightily peeved at this statement.
Angry old man, Lyon, France
Rehabilitation is all very well; I suggest that honest sportsmen, both competitors and followers are appalled with him and his attitude. He should be made aware that representing your country is an honour, not a right. Then he might profitably reflect on what he did to get into this hot water, consider his recent behaviour - then do the decent thing and aside.
C W Hamblin, Hove, Sussex
No winners here, not even Chambers who, let it be remembered, did not set the rules & regs now allowing him to compete.
Robert Baker, Ascot, England
all this proves is british athletes are not drug free if they were they would tell chambers to go run somewhere else not one present day team member will do this why because they all have some thing to hide
seamus, dublin, ireland
I completely agree with Charles from Epworth. Professional sports has been plauged with proformance enhancing drugs for many years, and it is often the case that athelites are unaware that they are taking it or simply the pressure of the need to succeed gets too much that there seems no other way. I am not condoning what Dwain Chambers did; cheating is cheating, but I am disgusted that the UKA is acting in such a childish and un professional way.
Dwain has served his time and as long as he keeps clean and keeps winning his races like he is doing he should be on the team and not publicly humiliated by the authority that should be supporting his return; because just to do what he has done takes allot of courage.
Dwain you have my 100% backing, it is brilliant to have you back in the sport and I am sure we will all be seeing you on the top of the WIC
UK Athletics grow up!!!!
Steve Williamson, Manchester, UK
David Millar was welcomed back with open arms by British Cycling after his doping offences - for the world champs. I can't see any difference to Chambers situation. Why the difference between UK sports bodies?
Surely we need a standard approach for all sports for ex-dopers????
steve, london,
Rehabilitation of Offenders Act seems appropriate in this case - "done the crime and done the time" And - the UKA's naivety. They have had years to build up tougher regulations to stop this type of event occurring but all they did was sit on their collective RS's and award themselves bigger salaries and live off other peoples efforts.
I don't like what you did to UK athletics Dwain but I support your effort to make a comeback.
Charles Dowie, Epworth, UK