Jill Sherman, Whitehall Editor
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
Olympic chiefs were accused of understating the true cost of the 2012 Games yesterday as it emerged that the bill for the aquatics centre was already four times higher than the original bid price.
The Olympic Delivery Authority (ODA) announced that the contract, which was awarded to Balfour Beatty, had risen from the 2005 price of £75 million to £303 million.
Officials argued that the new budget includes a £60 million bridge that will merge into the roof of the centre, which has a 17,500 seating capacity, two 50-metre swimming pools and a diving pool. The price also incorporates VAT costs and 5 per cent construction inflation, which were not part of the original bid, they insisted.
The figures come after soaring costs at most of the Olympic venues and have led to renewed fears that the £9.3 billion 2012 budget will be exceeded. Jack Lemley, the former chairman of the ODA, gave warning that the bill was now likely to be £20 billion and he claimed that Ken Livingstone and Tessa Jowell had been understating the true costs.
The cost of the main stadium has jumped from £280 million to £496 million and the ODA admitted yesterday that the budget for the velopark had nearly trebled from £28 million to £80 million.
The ODA insisted that the £303 million figure was part of the baseline budget announced by the Government in December. The figures are considerably higher than the estimates of £150 million, which were discussed last autumn after a redesign to cut costs. There has already been concern that the lack of bidders for the big venues has allowed contractors to dictate prices.
Mr Lemley claimed in a newspaper interview yesterday that from very early on the ODA was working to an estimate of well over £12 billion, nearly four times the £3.3 billion original bid price. He said that he now believed the final cost would be £20 billion because of the state of the Olympic site, including polluted water and a plant discharging sewage.
“We will never be able to go really public with the full budget,” Mr Lemley said. “That was always suppressed and the mayor didn’t want any significant growth in these budgets because it would create a bigger tax.”
A spokesman for the Department for Culture, Media and Sport, said: “These ridiculous claims come from someone who has had no connection whatsoever with the 2012 project for almost 18 months.
“It is simply untrue to say that the real budget is £12 billion and that this figure has been suppressed.”
Tessa Jowell, the Olympics Minister, said: “This is an important milestone met and illustrates that the project remains firmly on track. The aquatics centre and stadium will be the showcase venues for 2012 and I am delighted that British companies will build them.”
How prices have risen since 2004
Total 2012 budget up from £3.3 billion to £9.3 billion including contingency
Olympic stadium up from £280 million to £496 million
Aquatic centre up from £75million to £303million (including £60 million bridge)
Velodrome park up from £28million to £80 million (including BMX circuit)
Security costs outside the park up from £600m to £838m
Construction inflation at 5% a year expected to add 50% to venue costs by 2012
Source: ODA
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Perhaps we should add this as another sign of when a Labour government has been in power too long - public scandal inflation.
Ten years ago it was a public scandal when the Scottish Parliament went from £50m to £404m. Now we have budgets of BILLIONS being overrun. God only knows what the final costs will be.
Also interesting to note in these costs the implications for the perceived importance of a national parliament building vs a swimming pool, an athletics track & a cycling centre. Democracy gets £50m whereas, ahem, 'national' leisure facilities of benefit only to Londoners get £10 Bn plus. Bread & circuses anyone???
Still, it might stop the english whining about the Barnet formula for a while.
Dave, Edinburgh, UK
I'll build it for a tenner!
Then, in 3 months time, I can say that the quote didn't quite cover the actual costs and charge ten billion.
The government will get really good value out of a really very cheap quote... since it doesn't appear to concern them what anything like this, or the Dome, or the Channel Tunnel, actually ends up costing; just what they're told it will cost. All these and any number of others seem to be a backhanded way of getting more cash into construction companies pockets.
Honest, I'll do it for ten pounds! Can't say fairer than that!
What, no takers? Don't you want to save money? I've got mates in the building trade, don't you want to help them out? I'd bet that, if they got work for the next couple of years, I could even persuade them to join one of your dopey, corrupt political parties...
Steve, London, UK
The tenders are for basic structures. This keeps the real costs hidden to the public and allows politicians to publish fictitious figures commending them as good value. After some time has elapsed higher figures are published but the politicians state this is for extra work which was not on the original tender. And so it goes on, it's just a game to our leaders who after all have no shame claiming for all sorts of luxuries themselves which they call necessities for for being an MP.
bert, london,
No VAT in the original costs? Someone should be asking questions to the person(s) who accepted the tender. Or the persons whop wrote the contract documents and Bill of Quantities. A grave error
Jose, Portugal,
WOW, so what's new with the British Construction Industry.
Policy of giving â¬0.50 back to contractors who make savings is now going to be really really interesting.
Cancel the bids, redefine the scope of the works and call for European wide tenders of fixed lump sum, design and build contracts if you want to have any hope of holding budgets, which themselves may not be defined clearly.
Looks as though this is going to put the Banking issues in the shade.
noeldain, Paris, FRANCE.
I was always against this ridiculous waste of time and money - sadly the useless and inept Tory party Mer Majesty's supposed Opposition thought it would curry favour by supporting this stupid drug infested fiesta with the voters. Now we are picking up the cost tab in a big way - how many hospitals, transport improvements, protective armour for our troops is being sacrificed for this ego trip?
I say pull out now and let the IOC find some other suckers - congratulations Paris on coming second. We did the same with the World Athletics Championships and who cared.
Richard, Newton Abbot,
Well there is another 'surrpise'. How can any one submit tender for a job and then 'make up' extras all the things that they have alledgedly 'missed ' off in the tender, and it be just accepted. Are these tenders not checked by people who know what they are doing to weed out such potential huge errors before awarding the tenders and is it not one of the things that they are paid very handsomely to do? Construction inflation? mmm was this not thought of and planned into the costs at the offset. If I were to do my job role so badly I doubt that I would have one for very long. The only legacy that these games will leave us all is the higher taxes to pay for another farce by this incompetant mismanaged goverment. Whilst it is an honour for us to host the games I have to ask cant we ever manage to get anything built on budget......lets guess whats next...oh yeah the London 2014 Olympics rescheduled as we cant complete on time.
Miss P, Nuneaton, Warwickshire