Stuart Barnes
Win tickets to the ultimate village fete with welly wanging and more
The set-piece rules the world; this has been the Rugby World Cup where primary possession has been preeminent, with so few teams good enough, or bold enough, to attack with any conviction.
To control the scrum and lineout has been to allow the kicking units the ball to play the territory game. And so it was that South Africa’s towering lineout took its toll on England, and did what it did to every other lineout in the competition during the last six weeks – destroyed it.
Throughout the whole competition the Springboks have been untouchable on their own throw, whilst pilfering an average of 30% of opposition ball.
To upset the favourites, therefore, England really needed to challenge the Springboks at their strong point, but from the very first throw of the final in Paris matters proved all too predictable as the South Africans harried and hassled England’s lineout.
Tempo and confidence was always going to count heavily for an England team that was trying to build its self-belief on the back of momentum.
The momentum of two epic, ground-out knockout wins. But instead of England making the surging start and eating away at South Africa’s strength it was Mark Regan and his jumpers who were grounded with Bak-kies Botha reaching across Simon Shaw to steal England’s first throw.
The second was soon lost and the Springboks knew that, when in doubt, a ball belted down the touch line by Fourie Du Preez, Butch James or Percy Montgomery would enable them to have a decent sporting bet at regathering possession. In contrast, when England kicked possession away it was not coming back in their direction in any hurry.
The prime reason for this was the man of the match, Victor Matfield. The Blue Bulls lock forward has long dominated on the hard grounds of the High Veldt but this World Cup has seen him deliver the most polished performances time after time.
At the very summit of his game, he is the safest target in the sport. Not once did England even threaten to inhabit the same stratosphere in which Matfield plucked ball with consummate ease.
Mike Catt found a fine first-half touch within five metres of the Springbok line, but that was that. No chance of captain John Smit missing his middle jumper, who soared above all comers, last night and throughout the tournament. Ali Williams, of New Zealand, has grown as a world-class lock forward in recent months but Matfield is out on his own.
In Springbok colours he is aided and abetted by Juan Smith, the blind-side flanker who is probably the best back row lineout forward on the planet. It is an easy life for Smit, with three such targets.
England was aware of the challenge it posed. On the Tuesday before the final England’s Ben Kay and Simon Shaw were offered up for the delectation of the assembled media. Second rows are not regarded as the sexiest subjects on the rugby field; to push the pair into the forefront of the press conference was a tacit confession of where England would have to succeed if the Springboks were to be beaten.
Kay obeserved: “It is not a complicated lineout. They get into the air and cause a lot of problems, you don’t have to read a lot into their tactics. You know who will go up, it makes them more predictable on a negative side, but from their perspective there is less issue with the timing.”
Kay knows a thing or two about the lineouts; after last night we know a great deal more. England were handed a lesson in the ability to control the set-piece and with it the match.
It has been a tournament where percentages have dominated, so therefore the high rollers have been handed a back seat. To this mind, the balance has been way off kilter and the sides which address it and rediscover their feel for the game, will be the harder to stop. Last night saw a dearth of risk-taking. It was a case of ‘after you’, with the kickers looking for enough territory to force the errors.
With Matfield and his mates in command, the Springbok boots played off a sounder platform and it was England who attempted the creative stuff in the parts of the ground they did not intend to play.
South Africa’s first three points were a direct result of the otherwise outstanding Mathew Tait stepping back into a wall of tacklers in front of his own posts. Points, in this World Cup, in the form of penalties and not tries, win prizes and Percy Montgomery duly kicked his side into the lead when England had to make the early running.
A sly trip by Lewis Moody, which was superbly spotted by Alain Rolland, was another moment of sporting suicide as England offered themselves as sitting ducks to Montgomery. Against Australia discipline was first rate, but last Saturday against France it lapsed at potentially important moments. Fortunately, the hosts lacked the ingredients to punish England.
South Africa and their full-back did not. If a team is going to adopt such a basic game plan it must execute all the basics to near perfection. England, without the personnel or the belief to score tries out of nowhere, has to apply itself better than most.
Consider England’s try-scoring record against the older, more established nations (we will no longer call them the first tier in honour of the ‘smaller nations’ who have bloodied so many noses in this wonderful tournament). In the semi-final against France there was one try from a fortuitous bounce after 82 seconds – yet nothing for the next 78-and-a-half minutes of the match. The previous week England failed to score a single try against Australia, as they had against South Africa five weeks ago. Even in the two warm-up matches against France, just prior to the tournament, England failed to cross the try line. When a team has this paucity of strike-power every point matters.
To illustrate the difference between the 2007 world champions and the beaten finalists, South Africa scored 33 tries to England's 12 in this tournament.
A more confident South Africa would have backed themselves last night, but the pressure of the final straitjacketed them. As it was, Matfield and the lineout were more than good enough to reach out and grasp that World Cup.
Follow our three athletes' progress in their preparations for the London Triathlon, and pick up training tips and more
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers

Find a course, arrange a game and save money

Will your team win their match this weekend?

2002/02
£59,995
The Midlands
F/1989
£36,000
Hollingworth At Ombersley
2007/57
£35,000
South East England
Great car insurance deals online
90K plus bonus plus options
Confidential
London
To £28k
Barclaycard
Various (outside London)
£
£40,000 - £50,000 + benefits
Lloyds Pharmacy
Coventry
£38k
Barclaycard
Various Locations
Live in One of London's Most Vibrant Areas
From £249,950
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Stuart, A very insightful and free of spite assessment. You are the best rugby journo out there
Andrie, Johannesburg,
Was Barnes watching the same game as I did last night? Did he not see some of the line outs we disrupted, won against the throw? I do wonder if Barnes was actually born in the southern hemishpere? Why does he have to be so negative about a team who put their heart and soul in to the game. Shaw and Kay both played very well and did do the basics right. Unfortunately we did some silly things and some unlucky decisions. Good teams create their own luck and SA did that last night. We nearly did but it just wasn't to be.
Barnes your comment about tries, with the most prolific of defences in the game you would struggle now. To Barnes it was all about Champagne rugby and whilst as a supporter I would like to see it, I care more about winning. As we learnt last night, tries are not easy to achieve even when I think there was nothing wrong with it. I didn't see SA scoring a try last night? However well done the boks and well done England. True courage and comittment from both teams.
james, London, UK
Losing is a part of all sport. But it is the sportsmanship displayed within rugby that sets it apart. Those of us who have played and enjoyed the game, as well as all the die hard fans will know, when that final whistle blows, all of the games indescretions are long forgotten by the players, and a heart felt hand shake is offered for opprtunity afforded by them to battle on that day regradless of who has won and who has lost.
Winning is also part of all sport and tribute should be paid to the winners by the players and media alike. By this I don't mean attributing the perceived misgivings of the officials as a reason why a team lost, but to give direct praise to the team that went out on the day and won.
I was disspointed by the 12 page spread which gave a huge, and deserved, tribute to the English team for a monumental effort, but fell a long way short in giving praise to the tournament champions.
A little more sportsmanship please!
Brian Mckenzie, Byfleet, Surrey
To all the people who slate Stuart's commentary i would simply say it could be an aweful lot worse - Eddie Butler on BBC!!!! And they've got the 6 nations until something like 2012 so we've got to hear his codswallop from Feb-March/April every year until then. I wish sky had the rights to 6 nations. Miles & Stuart are a FAR better commentary team than any which has Eddie Butler in it
Mike, London,
Yeah the Boks beat England at their own game. The Boks knew exactly what they have to do and they did it. That's the beauty of rugby and the beauty of a brilliant team,..they can adapt to whatever game the want to play. As for England I take my hat of to your capt. Vickery and the boys. They really did England proud by sending arrogant Aussies home and then France. England and South Africa are very much the same,...NEVER right them off buddy,..NEVER! They've got guts and big BALLS and that's what's needed to win worldcups. All Blacks have 1!!!??? worldcup to show and the BOKS didnt even play then!.Well Done BOKKE and England!
Morne Hoole, Knysna, South Africa
As a South African currently living in the UK I was utterly disappointed at the front page article in the Sunday Times yesterday. The article was about a journalist going out and finding a SA citizen making totally inappropriate racists remarks during his visit to the World Cup final in Paris. Any country unfortunally have people with these views and it is a sad sad day that the editor of the Times thought it to be the best thing to report about after this great sporting event. I cant' help as a South African to think that it is sour grapes on the side of the English, winning the world cup and seeing black and white people celebrating our countries success was a wonderful moment for me, there is still a lot to be done in SA but we need to celebrate the good things and progress that bring us together. I am convinced that the editor of the Times have no interest in celebrating the success of a nation for whom this victory has meant much much more than just being called world champions. A disillusioned South African who bought her last Times yesterday.
Susan Van Rensburg, Norhthampton, UK
Could I just ask Mike Bunn if this is the same Mbeki who wants to select a SA national rugby team on the grounds of race not skill and has done nothing but support Mugabe's violence and sectarianism in Zimababe.....only wish they had refused to shake hands with the .........Brown as well!!
George Anthony Thompson, Ustaritz,
Mr Barnes, if I remember correctly, approximately a month before the RWC during a Super14 game you stated the Boks would never win the World cup with percy montgomery at full-back. When questioned, you replied, as if fact, that the better teams would find him out under the high ball - a statement you repeated in the Sunday times before the Argentina semi-final.
Will you retract and apologise to Percival for those comments? Even with potentially torn knee ligaments he never buckled!
Paul Acutt, Esher, Surrey, UK
Springbok kickers may have destroyed England as much as Stuart Barnes destroyed commentary. Surely it is time he came to understand that the TV audience can see what's going on and do not require his often superfluous and opinianated views. Most times his input lead to one watching the screen whilst listening to a radio commentary of the game..
T.P.Bowtle, Crail, Fife
While Gordon Brown watched Jonny Wilkinson in a vain attempt to milk some political capital, his government called in for public enquiry the planning application by the club that introduced Jonny to the game (Farnham) to develop a new ground alongside a sports and leisure facility. The reason? There is a pile of gravel under the proposed site that HMG needs to complete its plans to build 10,000's houses in the South East.
We hear the government rail against youth obesity, yet it stands in the way of doing anything about it for the most obvious, self serving reasons.
Talk all you like about the match, with such rot at the heart of government, how can we hope to improve our sporting performance?
Mark Weeks, Aldershot, Hampshire
- 1
- 2
Next