Stuart Barnes
Subscribe to The Times and The Sunday Times
IF THE current coaches are not to the liking of Martin Johnson (presuming he accepts the terms of the RFU) the question should not be who will be installed but why anyone would want to work for employers who are eclipsing British Airways in the management ineptitude stakes.
Brian Ashton has spent the best part of the week wondering whether he is still in a job and – if he is – what sort of redefinition has occurred. His main source of news has been the newspapers; according to close friends, communications have mysteriously broken down between him and Twickenham. Suddenly the head coach is persona non grata.
Whatever the rights and wrongs of Ashton’s era in charge of England, his recent treatment has been shameful. His tenure as head coach is daily reported as a process that is unravelling at such an uncontrollable speed that the only course of action left for him is a proud resignation.
Loyalty for taking a job when England were on their knees and playing a part in taking them to the World Cup final? Forget it, this is business, not sport. The more humiliation the better, if it forces his hand. This is the business for which Johnson and future coaches will be working.
To some extent Ashton has himself to blame. He has not been as strong as he could have been in selection and the result has been a delay in the redevelopment of England. Additionally he was too weak with Andrew when he accepted the initial terms. Instead of getting the carte blanche of his likely successor and the choice of his own management, he was left with a team that was not his ideal blend; the mixed messages have never stopped transmitting themselves and affecting the team.
Nor should he have allowed the contract to be described as a one-year rolling contract. True, terms take him to 2011 but the perception of immediate pressure and the desire to secure any sort of win to ease his way through what he expected to be a decision after 12, rather than an indecently hasty 4 months, stripped him of much of his radicalism.
Ashton at this point should have asked for his own management team and time to make his mark. Maybe he is guilty of wanting the position too much. Compared to what others in the RFU are guilty of, it amounts to the smallest of indiscretions.
Appointed by Andrew after such an extensive period (and after Andrew had let Shaun Edwards cross the River Severn) he had the right to expect support after just five of the year’s 11 internationals. And indeed, it appears that was initially the case, but the management board, spearheaded by Martyn Thomas, had taken the infantile route of populism. They want Martin Johnson, England’s World Cup-winning captain and the panacea for all the nation’s problems on the field. And they told Andrew as much.
The RFU director of elite rugby should have stood his ground and his decision to stand by Ashton. Instead he wavered and betrayed the head coach, allowing himself to be compromised rather than asking the board on what grounds Johnson is such a guaranteed banker. Ashton has long taken the director at his words only to find silence when support was needed.
In the process of this shabby business Andrew has been wounded, and the management board has revived itself. It has worked for Baron with all the flak, both for the reappointment of Ashton and the handling of recent events, being targeted in the direction of Andrew and the management board. Yet has Ashton not the right to question whether Baron himself should have played a more supportive role for Andrew – if he was not prepared to stand up to the board? Obviously not, the further one is from this stink, the better for the reputation. Throughout the year Ashton has done his level best for the RFU. Of course he has made mistakes, but to be treated as a pariah is a disgrace which will not be forgotten for a very long time to come.
Ashton probably feels as if he should walk away from the RFU; in principle he should but he will hang on and hope, it is all he can do. It may be scant consolation but whatever happens he has at least retained his dignity, something the RFU sacrificed for self-interest some time ago.
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles

Get three teams for £6 £100K prize fund to be won

Find a course, arrange a game and save money


Will your team win their match this weekend?
2007
£47,995
2008
£42,945
06/2006
£40,850
Great car insurance deals online
£33,000
Macmillan Cancer Support
Central/South West
£50k
NHS
Nationwide
£
£30k OTE
Meltwater News
Nationwide
circa £70k
Central Office of Information
London
Great Dubai Investment Opportunities
from £89,950
Luxury Appts, beautiful gardens w/ Thames views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Great Investment, River Views
New York Christmas Shopping
Christmas Cruises
From only £995pp
APTs East Coast now from only
£2425pp.
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
As said by many before me. . . I would like to have seen the same scenario attempted to be applied to Mr Henry or Mr White
Jim, Melbourne, Australia
A lawsuit for Constructive Dismissal is surely on the cards.
Richard Earney, Enfield, United Kingdom