David Sharrock
Enter our Snapshots of Summer photography competition

Read reaction to the ban from Times Online surf blogger Alex Wade
It used to be the surfing world’s favourite airline — but now the crowd just wanting to get stoked, amped and pumped on foreign shores think British Airways is a complete bummer.
BA is refusing to reverse a decision to ban surfboards as check-in baggage from all their flights from next month.
The ban on all surfboards — from traditional longboards to stubby shortboards weighing just 4kg which can be carried in a bag with shoulder straps — has stunned the British Surfing Association (BSA) and left many surfers around the world scrambling to make alternative travelling arrangements.
Karen Walton, national director of the BSA, said the ban was “inexplicable”. She said: “We’d find it extremely hard to believe that the average Mini Mal (surfboard) would be more difficult to handle when compared to a double bass and a full bag of golf clubs.” She added that the ban would be bad news for the growing numbers of surfers travelling to destinations around the world.
Ms Walton also said that among those who would be disappointed were the British surfing teams, who have previously chosen BA “mostly as a result of their generally fair baggage policy”.
Ms Walton continued: “We therefore feel completely let down and angered by the news that our national airline is banning surfboards rather than following some other airlines and charging a supplementary fee.” BA restarted its flights between Gatwick and Newquay, the UK’s premier surfing destination, in March after a three-year absence.
“We stumbled across the ban by chance when looking at the BA website. They have agreed to honour bookings made prior to 6th November, when the ban comes in, and have suggested that we use freight carriers,” Ms Walton told The Times.
“But I checked one of these companies out and for a weekend trip to southwest France I was told it would cost £205 each way to ship a board and would take six days to get there and six to get back.
“BA fly to an awful lot of surf-friendly destinations and their ban is going to impact upon global surf tourism. Developing countries like Sri Lanka are tapping into this market. It’s also going to affect surfers who live in places like Jersey, who are virtually dependent on BA to get on and off the island.”
BSA has started an online petition, ’Stop the BA Surfboard Ban’, which includes endorsements from the likes of Mick Fanning, ranked number one in the world surfing championships who is a BA Platinum Card holder in the airline’s Frequent Flyer scheme.
“As a World Championship Tour surfer it is the only airline I choose to fly to and from Europe,” he said in his entry. “If you do not take my surfboards I will not be able to compete in my World Tour events.” A BA spokeswoman said it was not a ban on surfboards but added:<WC> “<WC1>We are not accepting them at check-in to go in the hold. We do accept a lot of sporting equipment but we have refined the list that we accept.” The ban includes windsurfing boards and sails, hang-gliders, kayaks and canoes, vaulting poles and javelins. But golf clubs, bicycles, fishing rods and even snowboards will still be accepted.
“It won’t affect many of our passengers, we carry only two or three surfboards a day for 100,000 daily passengers,” the spokeswoman added.
Around half a million people surf in Britain and the sport is growing rapidly.
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more



Free luxury travel brochures from specialist tour operators. Find your perfect holiday
Worldwide holidays from Times Selects. View our e-brochure and check out our superb collection of escorted tours
Advertise your home to the best travel audience on Times Online and VacationRentalPeople.com
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Prior to this ridiculous incident BA were my first choice, simply because they always treated my friends and I and our boards with the upmost respect. The ban suggested BA didn't have a clue how many surfers travelled with them but now their statement proves it '2 or 3 per 100,000 passengers' this is laughable. They must be looking at figures for their Middle Eastern operations from the 1940s or something. Surifng is far larger than even most surfers believe. As Karen Walton rightly pointed out many developing countries depend upon surf tourism for their income one great example of this is Morocco. The London- Agadir route operated by BA has upwards of 20 surfers on each departure during British winter time and many of the towns North of Agadir depend on the money brought in by surfers to survive. On top of this I read yesterday that surfboards were the second most carried items on flights (golfclubs were the first), but how many golfers do you see venturing into deepest darkest Indo?
Rob B, Cardiff, Wales
It should be pointed out to the likes of Chris in Bangkok that the proposed ban has nothing to do with hand luggage. BA are proposing to ban a seemingly arbitrarily selected list of sporting items from being carried altogether (i.e. in the hold). I can't think of any time that I've attempted to take my kayak into the cabin of the plane with me. Nor have I ever encountered a surfboard that weighed 50 pounds.
I too have difficulty believing the figure of two or three per 100,000 passengers. It should be pointed out that activities such as surfing are a) largely seasonal and b) usually limited to certain localities (one wouldn't go surfing in Chicago). I think BA can look forward to losing a great deal of business on some of their routes.
Richard Repper, High Wycombe, UK
Great idea. I too am not a great fan of BA but this time they have got it right. Most of the time allowed between boarding and aircraft and it taking off is due to people who carry oversize and unmanageable goods as hand luggage.
I was a regular, one return per fortnight, user of the Kuala Lumpur Singapore Shuttle service between 15 and 10 years ago. At check in they had a topless cage. If your hand baggage did not fit in it was moved to the hold.
I believe that the airlines should provide a service that enables sports people to carry their own personal equipment but it should be in the hold and loaded by an expert at the same time the passengers are boarding. I also believe it should be chargeable.
When I took my 4 month old son from Heathrow to Changi I was charged 80 PST. All I got was a sky cot and a bottle warming service. If I have to pay for a 2 feet long 20 pound human why shouldn't another passenger pay for the 6 foot 50 pound surf board.
Chris, Bangkok, Thailand
Two or three per 100,000 daily passengers? I wonder if they realise how many people will boycott them for this even if they aren't travelling with gear on the band list... (and don't think skiis are ok, look at the max lenght incase they decide to start enforceing it after you book your flights!)
And do they really think £75 off my next flight with them is a reasonable compensation when I complained about they're 1970s baggage system which is the real problem with BA and bags.
Michael, Cambridge,
Don't know why you'd want to fly with BA anyway. I've travelled with a large number of airlines, and they're still the worst I've ever experienced. They make Air Asia look first class.
Nick, Christchurch, New Zealand